Off Tangent Comix
DNA Blueprints Guide The Construction Of Specific Human Structures
| Work Force Changes Narrow The Gender Wage Gap, Not Pay |
|
|
| Living - Workplace | |||
| TS-Si News Service | |||
| Tuesday, 12 August 2008 16:30 | |||
![]()
Providence, RI, USA. There is an increasing perception that working women are treated more fairly in today’s labor market than they were 30 years ago. However, the apparent closing of the wage gap between men and women may be a “statistical illusion,” creating the impression that pay scales have become more equitable.
Disputing decades of economic literature, two economists show that the apparent narrowing of the wage gap between working men and women is actually due to the type of women who are now working. Pay is not the primary factor in any perceived improvements. The findings are published in The Quarterly Journal of Economics.
Selection, Investment, and Women's Relative Wages Over Time. Casey B. Mulligan and Yona Rubinstein. Quarterly Journal of Economics 123(3) 1061-1110. doi: 10.1162 / qjec.2008.123.3.1061
Brown University economist Yona Rubinstein and Casey Mulligan of the University of Chicago points to “statistical illusion.” as the source of misperceptions. “Though decades of economic research suggest men and women are equalizing in the labor market, the notion that today’s working women are being paid more and treated better than ever before is simply wrong,” said Rubinstein, assistant professor of economics.
“The growing equality between genders reflects the entry of the most able women to the workforce rather than better pay. While there may be more women holding high-power positions today, they are still being paid as their counterparts were three decades ago.”
Although previous economic observers have called these simultaneous growths “curiously coincidental,” Rubinstein and Mulligan connect these two phenomena and show that growing wage inequality within gender groups was actually a catalyst for bringing “highly able” women into the labor market.
The authors show that this wage growth for women might not have happened if the workforce composition had been held constant.
The authors suggest that growing inequality within gender, through its effect on women’s selection into the labor force, their labor force attachment, and their human capital investment, is a major reason why the wages of the female workforce have grown relative to men’s. This goves the impression that they are being treated more fairly than they were 30 years ago.
Using data from the Current Population Survey (CPS) and IQ data taken from the National Longitudinal Surveys (NLS), the authors used three different empirical approaches to measure the existence and importance of these effects.
Set as favorite
Bookmark
Email This
Comments (0)
![]() Write comment
|
|||
| Last Updated on Tuesday, 12 August 2008 16:12 |







The TS-Si News Service is a collaborative effort by TS-Si.org editors, contributors, and corresponding institutions. The sources can include the cited individuals and organizations, as well as TS-Si.org staff contributions. Articles and news reports do not necessarily convey official positions of TS-Si, its partners, or affiliates. We welcome your comments. Use the form below to leave a public comment or send private correspondence via the 
The TS-Si News Service is a collaboration of TS-Si staff, contributors, and corresponding institutions. Contents do not necessarily convey official positions of TS-Si, its partners, or affiliates