Campaigns

Petition: remove women of transsexual / intersex history from the GLAAD Media Reference Guide.
[ link ] Also read Andrea Rosenfield's call for reform here at TS-Si.[ link ]

TS-Si supports open and immediate access to publicly funded research.
Diversions
TS-Si Site News
Public-Private Sector Employee Compensation |
![]() |
![]() |
Nation - Workplace | |
TS-Si News Service | |
Monday, 04 April 2011 03:00 | |
Los Angeles, CA, USA. A new paper compares compensation for public-sector and private-sector employees and proposes "grand bargains" to address state budget problems, provide better services to the general public and treat employees fairly.
The researchers say that public-sector workers accept a lower total wage and benefits package than their private-sector counterparts. The trade-off is that public-sector jobs are more secure, and health and pension benefits are generally greater than in the private sector. David Lewin, a professor at the UCLA Anderson School of Management, and Thomas Kochan, a professor at the MIT Sloan School of Management, released the findings, with contributions from various professors at the Employment Policy Research Network (EPRN)
Public-sector union–management relations have changed significantly, according to Joel Cutcher-Gershenfeld, dean of the School of Labor and Employment Relations at the University of Illinois, Urbana–Champaign. "Dispute-resolution procedures, such as fact-finding, mediation and arbitration, have proven themselves as alternatives to strikes and served as a foundation for the alternative dispute-resolution movement in society," he said. He goes on to say that given states' budget problems, negotiations present opportunities for public employers and employees to work together in ways that provide better, more efficient service to the public while also recognizing and respecting employee rights. Two major issues facing state and local governments are rising health care and pension costs. These issues need to be addressed state by state on a coalition bargaining, problem-solving basis, Cutcher-Gershenfeld said. When approached by management and labor as a mutually beneficial process, new-style collective bargaining provides an ideal venue for tackling these issues. Kochan said he and the other researchers envision a three-step, state-by-state process to come to terms with budget deficits while still respecting public-employee rights:
"We need nothing less than a transformation of labor-management relationships in the public sector," Kochan said. "Public employees want to do a good job and provide service at a high level, and they deserve to have good jobs and effective work systems." According to Lewin, "citizens have a right to expect accountability and high performance from public employees and those who manage them." ParticipantsDavid Lewin (UCLA), Thomas Kochan (MIT), Joel Cutcher-Gershenfeld (Illinois), Teresa Ghilarducci (New School for Social Research), Harry Katz (Cornell), Jeff Keefe (Rutgers), Daniel J.B. Mitchell (UCLA), Craig Olson (Illinois), Saul Rubinstein (Rutgers) and Christian Weller (U. Mass Boston).
CitationGetting It Right: Empirical Evidence and Policy Implications From Research on Public-Sector Unionism and Collective Bargaining. David Lewin, Thomas Kochan, Joel Cutcher-Gershenfeld, Teresa Ghilarducci, Harry Katz, Jeff Keefe, Daniel J.B. Mitchell, Craig Olson, Saul Rubinstein and Christian Weller. Employment Policy Research Network (EPRN) and the Labor and Employment Relations Association (LERA)Labor and Employment Relations Association (LERA) (March 16, 2011).
Download PDF Introduction (Excerpt) The United States is in the throes of a public-policy debate about public-sector unionism and collective bargaining. The ostensible trigger of this debate is the fiscal crises that state and local governments have been experiencing since 2008. The debate largely centers on the extent to which public employee unions have contributed to this crisis through the pay and benefits they have negotiated for public employees. The role of government as employer is connected in this debate to the role of government as a taxing authority and provider of public services. These roles are often claimed to be in conflict with one another — that is, governments as employers are seen as not exercising the same due diligence in setting pay and benefits as private-sector employers. The research evidence indicates, however, that these claims about public employment are based on incomplete and in some cases inaccurate understanding. Quote this article on your site To create link towards this article on your website, copy and paste the text below in your page. Preview :
Bookmark
Email This
Comments (0)
Write comment
|
|
Last Updated on Monday, 04 April 2011 09:02 |