RSS Feed: TS-Si News Service. RSS Feed: TS-Si Research Service. TS-Si Reader Comments. Delicious: TS-Si News Service. Digg: TS-Si News Service.
Pinterest.
StumbleUpon. Facebook: TS-Si News Service.
GooglePlus: TS-Si News Service.
Twitter: Follow TS-Si News Service.

TS-Si is dedicated to the acceptance, medical treatment, and legal protection of individuals correcting the misalignment of their brains and their anatomical sex, while supporting their transition into society as hormonally reconstituted and surgically corrected citizens.
TS-Si supports open access to publicly funded research.

Leave a comment.
The Link Between Thinking Styles and Religious Faith Print E-mail
Living - The Dialogue
TS-Si News Service   
Saturday, 24 September 2011 08:00
Intuitive thinking.Boston, MA, USA. Intuition may lead people toward a belief in the Divine and help explain why some people have more faith in God than others. In a series of studies, researchers found that people with a more intuitive thinking style tend to have stronger beliefs in God than those with a more reflective style.

Intuitive thinking means going with a first instinct and reaching decisions quickly based on automatic cognitive processes. Reflective thinking involves the questioning of first instinct and consideration of other possibilities, allowing for counterintuitive decisions.


"We wanted to explain variations in belief in God in terms of more basic cognitive processes," said Amitai Shenhav. "Some say we believe in God because our intuitions about how and why things happen lead us to see a divine purpose behind ordinary events that don't have obvious human causes. This led us to ask whether the strength of an individual's beliefs is influenced by how much they trust their natural intuitions versus stopping to reflect on those first instincts."

The study from the Psychology Department at Harvard University was conducted by Amitai Shenhav, a doctoral student; post-doctoral fellow David G. Rand, PhD; and associate professor Joshua D. Greene, PhD.

The research findings appear in the Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.
In the first part of the study, 882 U.S. adults, with a mean age of 33 and consisting of 64 percent women, completed online surveys about their belief in God before taking a cognitive reflection test. The test had three math problems with incorrect answers that seemed intuitive. For example, one question stated: "A bat and a ball cost $1.10 in total. The bat costs $1 more than the ball. How much does the ball cost?" The automatic or intuitive answer is 10 cents, but the correct answer is 5 cents. Participants who had more incorrect answers showed a greater reliance on intuition than reflection in their thinking style.

Participants who gave intuitive answers to all three problems were 1 ½ times as likely to report they were convinced of God's existence as those who answered all of the questions correctly. That pattern was found regardless of other demographic factors, such as the participants' political beliefs, education or income.

"How people think — or fail to think — about the prices of bats and balls is reflected in their thinking, and ultimately their convictions, about the metaphysical order of the universe," the journal article stated.

Participants with an intuitive thinking style also were more likely to have become more confident believers in God over their lifetimes, regardless of whether they had a religious upbringing. Individuals with a reflective style tended to become less confident in their belief in God. The study also found that this pronounced link between differing thinking styles and levels of faith could not be explained by differences in the participants' thinking ability or IQ.

"Basic ways of thinking about problem solving in your everyday life are predictive of how much you believe in God," Rand said. "It's not that one way is better than the other. Intuitions are important and reflection is important, and you want some balance of the two. Where you are on that spectrum affects how you come out in terms of belief in God."

In another study, with 373 participants, the researchers found they could temporarily influence levels of faith by instructing participants to write a paragraph describing a personal experience where either intuitive or reflective thinking led to a good result. One group was told to describe a time in their lives when intuition or first instinct led to a good outcome, while a second group was instructed to write about an experience where a good outcome resulted from reflecting and carefully reasoning through a problem. When they were surveyed about their beliefs after the writing exercise, participants who wrote about a successful intuitive experience were more likely to report they were convinced of God's existence than those who wrote about a successful reflective experience.

These studies suggest a causal link between intuitive thinking and a belief in God, but the researchers acknowledged the opposite may also be true, that a belief in God may lead to intuitive thinking. Future research will help explore how cognitive styles are influenced by genes and environmental factors, such as upbringing and education, Rand said.

CitationDivine Intuition: Cognitive Style Influences Belief in God. Amitai Shenhav, David G. Rand, and Joshua D. Greene. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2011. doi:10.1037/a0025391
Download PDF
Abstract

Some have argued that belief in God is intuitive, a natural (by-)product of the human mind given its cognitive structure and social context. If this is true, the extent to which one believes in God may be influenced by one's more general tendency to rely on intuition versus reflection. Three studies support this hypothesis, linking intuitive cognitive style to belief in God. Study 1 showed that individual differences in cognitive style predict belief in God. Participants completed the Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT; Frederick, 2005), which employs math problems that, although easily solvable, have intuitively compelling incorrect answers. Participants who gave more intuitive answers on the CRT reported stronger belief in God. This effect was not mediated by education level, income, political orientation, or other demographic variables. Study 2 showed that the correlation between CRT scores and belief in God also holds when cognitive ability (IQ) and aspects of personality were controlled. Moreover, both studies demonstrated that intuitive CRT responses predicted the degree to which individuals reported having strengthened their belief in God since childhood, but not their familial religiosity during childhood, suggesting a causal relationship between cognitive style and change in belief over time. Study 3 revealed such a causal relationship over the short term: Experimentally inducing a mindset that favors intuition over reflection increases self-reported belief in God.

Keywords: reasoning, religion, religiosity, reflection, atheism.

TS-Si News Service.The TS-Si News Service is a collaborative effort by TS-Si.org editors, contributors, and corresponding institutions. Sources can include the cited individuals and organizations, as well as TS-Si.org staff contributions. Articles and news reports do not necessarily convey official positions of TS-Si, its partners, or affiliates. We welcome your comments. Use the form below to leave a public comment or send private correspondence via the TS-Si Contact Page. We will not divulge any personal details or place you on a mailing list without your permission.


TS-Si is dedicated to the acceptance, medical treatment, and legal protection of individuals correcting the misalignment of their brains and their anatomical sex, while supporting their transition into society as hormonally reconstituted and surgically corrected citizens.


Last Updated on Friday, 23 September 2011 19:38
 

Comments   

 
# Peter K 2011-09-28 10:49
A critique of the journal article "Divine Intuition: Cognitive Style Influences Belief in God" was done here: biodeterminism.blogspot.com/2011/09/critical-meditations-on-study-divine.html The original study is not quite as solid as your summary above suggests.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
# Biodeterminism & ScientismSharon S. Gaughan 2011-09-28 12:08
The link posted by Peter K leads to a biodeterminism blog that includes a lengthy critique of the referenced research from a Scientism perspective.

Biodeterminism applies determinism in the field of biology, taking the rigid view that complex individual and collective behavior is fully determined by biological and genetic factors, without reference to other factors.

Scientism has several philosophical critiques, but most prominent is the insistence on empirical science is the most authoritative worldview. Several philosophers of science and social scientists describe scientism as dogmatic in its reduction of knowledge to that which is derived from the measurable.

While often handled responsibly by amateurs, scientism -- especially when combined with biodeterminism -- has been misused to either make false claims in the name of science and/or use science in a reductionist manner to eliminate spiritual dimensions of experience.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
# dianakat 2011-09-29 03:07
The study employs an interesting use of the phrase "intuitive" thinking style, which may not be consistent with the way the terms are used in personality inventories. Please be assured that many of us that test as "strong intuitives" on Myers Briggs, et al (and we are disproportionat ely women), would not make stupid mistakes on simple math problems such as the example used in the article.

Many of us can in fact think, and we already face enough stereotypes to the contrary.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
# Testing PressureSharon S. Gaughan 2011-09-29 03:38
One of the main problems posed by things like "stupid math mistakes" is the influence of testing per se, a common issue with psych work.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
# Pamela 2011-09-30 04:54
As a side note; While working full time toward my degree and going to school 3/4 time for my BS degree,, I had an instructor in one of my management courses that was working on his PhD dissertation. His project was to develop a "test" that would predict how well a potential employee would perform in a particular job within the company. (wish I could remember his name and had a copy of his trial "test").
The really interesting thing was that the "test" was actually a better predictor of GPA and graduation level than the SAT's, and other entrance exams.
He found that those that you got ahead and everything that happened was due to "God" or some other "Supreme being" generally had a low GPA and often dropped out of school; Those that believed you got ahead thanks to your own hard work and intelligence were generally in the top 10% of the graduating class. He had several other levels of "beliefs" that correlated quite well.
One interesting thing he also noticed was that those in the lower Third of the graduating class had a goal of becoming a "teacher" or "educator". His Advisor was pushing him to say "the heck" to the degree and publishing his results and selling his test.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 

Add comment

TS-Si often publishes material that presents challenges and insights worthy of extended discussion. We encourage lively, open debate and ask that you show respect for others with responsible comments. This can be done with emotional maturity and intelligence. Before commenting, please thoroughly read the article and other comments, then stay on topic. Address the issues without presumptions about the author(s) or other persons.

We will remove any comment that is a personal attack or off-topic, abusive, exceptionally incoherent, libelous, mysogonist, obscene, phobic, profane, racist, or otherwise inappropriate. Removal for cause may occur without prior notice and repeat offenders may lose commenting privileges. These abuses and/or any attempt to post a solicitations and/or advertising, flood, spam, or otherwise disrupt TS-Si.org operations are subject to further sanctions.

All comments are subject to our terms of use and overall site policies, available under the About menu tab.


Security code
Refresh