Campaigns

Petition: remove women of transsexual / intersex history from the GLAAD Media Reference Guide.
[ link ] Also read Andrea Rosenfield's call for reform here at TS-Si.[ link ]

TS-Si supports open and immediate access to publicly funded research.
xkcd
TS-Si Site News
State Intervention and Life Satisfaction |
![]() |
![]() |
Living - Society | |||
TS-Si News Service | |||
Sunday, 08 May 2011 09:00 | |||
Waco, TX, USA. People living in countries with governments that have a greater number of social services report being more satisfied with life, according to a study by a Baylor University researcher.
Dr. Patrick Flavin, assistant professor of political science at Baylor University, said the effect of state intervention into the economy equaled or exceeded marriage when it came to satisfaction. The benefits of free market capitalism have been championed by leaders such as the late President Ronald Reagan and former Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, while left-leaning political parties and labor movements argue for more government intervention into the market. However, scholars have paid relatively little empirical attention to the debate in terms of which approach leads to more satisfaction among citizens. Overview The findings contrast with the views of economists who are critical of government intervention and the welfare state in particular, arguing it can lead to inefficiency and wastefulness that will hurt employment, wages and economic growth. However, the research reported on here is focused only on the link between government intervention and life satisfaction — not whether it achieves economic growth or such goals as reducing poverty or violent crime. Patrick Flavin says "to the extent that it is a primary task of democratic governments to secure the well-being of their citizens, studying what government activities make citizens happier helps inform the 'politics vs. markets' debate". The US had one of the lowest levels of state intervention among the countries, but still has a more expansive safety net than most developing countries.Flavin co-authored the study with Dr. Alexander C. Pacek, associate professor of political science at Texas A&M; University, and Dr. Benjamin Radcliff, professor of political science at the University of Notre Dame. The research group used data from the World Values Survey 2005 study. Their findings appear in the journal Politics & Policy. The study measured government intervention into the economy in four ways:
The research included 10,405 people from 15 advanced industrialized countries who were asked
"In many cases, less government intervention can allow for a more efficient economy, but greater economic efficiency doesn't necessarily translate into greater contentment with one's life," Flavin said. "If you get sick and can't work or lose your job and there are few social protections in place, you're more likely to be anxious and less satisfied." The findings rule out alternative explanations including individual characteristics — such as personal health, level of education and marital status — and such national factors as gross domestic product and unemployment rate. The findings were consistent regardless of whether respondents were rich or poor and regardless of their political views, Flavin said. Participation: NationalThe 15 countries included in the study are Australia, Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Great Britain, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Norway, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United States.
CitationState Intervention and Subjective Well-Being in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Patrick Flavin, Alexander C. Pacek, Benjamin Radcliff. Politics & Policy 2011; 39(2): 251-269. doi:10.1111/j.1747-1346.2011.00290.x
Abstract While there is a vast and contentious literature devoted to the debate over “politics versus markets,” scholars have devoted little empirical attention to the fundamental question of how the choice between these two approaches to public policy affects the overall quality of human life. Contending arguments make powerful claims for the superiority of each as the best mechanism for generating and distributing well-being. We attempt an empirical appraisal of this issue, using the extent to which individuals find their lives to be satisfying as an evaluative metric. Considering individual levels of life satisfaction in advanced industrial democracies using the most recent wave of survey data from the World Values Survey, we find that citizens are more satisfied with their lives as the level of state intervention into the market economy increases. Keywords: happiness, life satisfaction, politics, welfare, policy.
To create link towards this article on your website, copy and paste the text below in your page. Preview :
Bookmark
Email This
Trackback(0)
Comments (1)
Write comment
|
|||
Last Updated on Saturday, 07 May 2011 22:19 |