FeedFeed2CommentsDeliciousDiggFacebookTwitter
Leave a comment.
Campaigns
Sign the petition to remove the umbrella use of the term 'transgender' to cover women of transsexual / intersex history.
Petition: remove women of transsexual / intersex history from the GLAAD Media Reference Guide.
[ link ] Also read Andrea Rosenfield's call for reform here at TS-Si.[ link ]
TS-Si supports open access to publicly funded research.
TS-Si supports open and immediate access to publicly funded research.
xkcd
TS-Si Site News
TS-Si Reboot Gets Underway
Seat of Justice In The Brain? Print E-mail
Living - Society
TS-Si News Service   
Thursday, 05 May 2011 09:00
Stockholm, Sweden. The brain has built-in mechanisms that trigger an automatic reaction to someone who refuses to share. The reaction derives from the amygdala, an older part of the brain.

The subjects' sense of justice was challenged in a two-player money-based fairness game, while their brain activity was registered by an MR scanner. When bidders made unfair suggestions as to how to share the money, they were often punished by their partners even if it cost them. A drug that inhibits amygdala activity subdued this reaction to unfairness.


The study, a collaboration between the Karolinska Institutet and the Stockholm School of Economics that appears in the journal PLoS Biology, is based on the universal human behaviour to react aggressively when another person contravenes the norm of acting in the best interests of the group by behaving unfairly.



A reaction in the amygdala during the Ultimate Game, courtesy of PLoS Biology and the study authors.
The researchers had 35 subjects play a money-based fairness game (the Ultimate Game), whereby one player suggests to another how a fixed sum of money is to be shared between them; the other player can then either accept the suggestion and take the money, or reject it, in which case neither player receives anything.

"If the sum to be shared is 100 SEK kronor and the suggestion is 50 each, everyone accepts it as it is seen as fair," says Dr Katarina Gospic. "But if the suggestion is that you get 20 and I take 80, it's seen as unfair. In roughly half the cases it ends up with the player receiving the smaller share rejecting the suggestion, even though it costs them 20 SEK. Doing this, they punish the player making the unfair suggestion despite losing out themselves."

By registering the subjects' brain activity with an MR scanner during play, the researchers were able to see that the brain area controlling these financial decisions was located in the amygdala, an evolutionary old and therefore more primitive part of the brain that controls feelings of anger and fear. Previous research has suggested that the ability to analyse and make decisions of a financial nature is located in the prefrontal cortex.

In the present study, the subjects were either given the anti-anxiety tranquilliser Oxazepam or a sugar pill (placebo) while playing the Ultimate Game.
  • The researchers found that those who had received the drug showed lower amygdala activity and a stronger tendency to accept an unfair distribution of the money — this despite the fact that when asked, they still considered the suggestion unfair.

  • In the control group, the tendency to react aggressively and punish the player who had suggested the unfair distribution of money was directly linked to an increase in activity in the amygdala.

  • A gender difference was also observed, with men responding more aggressively to unfair suggestions than women and showing a correspondingly higher rate of amygdalic activity. This gender difference was not found in the group that received Oxazepam.

"This is an incredibly interesting result that shows that it isn't just processes in the prefrontal cortex that determine this kind of decision about financial equitability, as was previously thought", says Professor Martin Ingvar. "Our findings, however, can also have ethical implications since the use of certain drugs can clearly affect our everyday decision-making processes."

FundingThe work was funded by the Swedish Research Council, the Barbro and Bernard Osher Foundation, the Swedish Agency for Innovation Systems (VINNOVA), the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research, the Jan Wallander and Tom Hedelius Foundation, the Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research and the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation and the Karolinska Institutet.
CitationLimbic Justice — Amygdala Involvement in Immediate Rejection in the Ultimate Game. Katarina Gospic, Erik Mohlin, Peter Fransson, Predrag Petrovic, Magnus Johannesson, Martin Ingvar. PLoS Biology 9(5): e1001054. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001054
Download PDF
Abstract

Imaging studies have revealed a putative neural account of emotional bias in decision making. However, it has been difficult in previous studies to identify the causal role of the different sub-regions involved in decision making. The Ultimatum Game (UG) is a game to study the punishment of norm-violating behavior. In a previous influential paper on UG it was suggested that frontal insular cortex has a pivotal role in the rejection response. This view has not been reconciled with a vast literature that attributes a crucial role in emotional decision making to a subcortical structure (i.e., amygdala). In this study we propose an anatomy-informed model that may join these views. We also present a design that detects the functional anatomical response to unfair proposals in a subcortical network that mediates rapid reactive responses. We used a functional MRI paradigm to study the early components of decision making and challenged our paradigm with the introduction of a pharmacological intervention to perturb the elicited behavioral and neural response. Benzodiazepine treatment decreased the rejection rate (from 37.6% to 19.0%) concomitantly with a diminished amygdala response to unfair proposals, and this in spite of an unchanged feeling of unfairness and unchanged insular response. In the control group, rejection was directly linked to an increase in amygdala activity. These results allow a functional anatomical detection of the early neural components of rejection associated with the initial reactive emotional response. Thus, the act of immediate rejection seems to be mediated by the limbic system and is not solely driven by cortical processes, as previously suggested. Our results also prompt an ethical discussion as we demonstrated that a commonly used drug influences core functions in the human brain that underlie individual autonomy and economic decision making.

Author Summary

It is well-established that emotions influence decision making. One way of studying this relationship is the Ultimatum Game, which has revealed that subjects punish unfair behavior in others in spite of receiving a concomitant economic loss. Previous brain imaging studies have suggested that this decision to punish involves complex cortical processing. However, punishment also involves an instant aggressive emotional response, a behavior often linked to subcortical structures such as the amygdala. In this study, we present a model that joins these views. We designed a paradigm that allows us to measure the activity of subcortical brain regions during decision making in the Ultimatum Game, while at the same time using a pharmacological approach that can suppress emotional responses and amygdala activity. The pharmacological treatment made subjects punish unfair behavior less, and decreased brain activity in the amygdala in response to unfair proposals, without changing the subjects' feeling of unfairness. In the control group, punishment was directly linked to an increase in amygdala activity. Thus, immediate punishment of unfair behavior involves the amygdala and is not solely driven by cortical processes, as previously suggested. Our results show that a commonly used drug influences autonomy and decision making, which may have ethical implications for its use.

Abbreviations: ACC, anterior cingulate cortex; dlPFC, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; fMRI, functional MRI; mPFC, medial prefrontal cortex; RL, reinforcement learning; SEK, Swedish crowns; UG, Ultimatum Game.

TS-Si News ServiceThe TS-Si News Service is a collaborative effort by TS-Si.org editors, contributors, and corresponding institutions. The sources can include the cited individuals and organizations, as well as TS-Si.org staff contributions. Articles and news reports do not necessarily convey official positions of TS-Si, its partners, or affiliates.

We welcome your comments. Use the form below to leave a public comment or send private correspondence via the TS-Si Contact Page. We will not divulge any personal details or place you on a mailing list without your permission.


TS-Si is dedicated to the acceptance, medical treatment, and legal protection of individuals correcting the misalignment of their brains and their anatomical sex, while supporting their transition into society as hormonally reconstituted and surgically corrected citizens.

Tweet
Quote this article on your site

To create link towards this article on your website,
copy and paste the text below in your page.




Preview :


Trackback(0)
Comments (0)

Write comment
smaller | larger

Last Updated on Thursday, 05 May 2011 09:13
 
FeedFeed2CommentsDeliciousDiggFacebookTwitter