is dedicated to the acceptance, medical
treatment, and legal
protection of individuals correcting the misalignment
of their brains and their anatomical sex, while supporting their transition
into society as hormonally reconstituted and surgically corrected citizens.
FeedFeed2CommentsDeliciousDiggFacebookTwitter
Leave a comment.
GLAAD Media Reference Guide
Petition: remove women of transsexual / intersex history from the GLAAD Media Reference Guide.
[ link ] Also read Andrea Rosenfield's call for reform here at TS-Si.[ link ]
TS-Si supports open access to publicly funded research.
TS-Si supports open and immediate access to publicly funded research.
TS-Si Reboot Gets Underway
Ancient Evolutionary Roots For Human Prejudice Print E-mail
Living - Society
TS-Si News Service   
Friday, 18 March 2011 15:00
New Haven, CT, USA. The tendency to perceive others as us versus them isn't exclusively human but appears to be shared by our primate cousins.

Researchers showed in a series of experiments that monkeys treat individuals from outside their groups with the same suspicion and dislike as their human cousins tend to treat outsiders, suggesting that the roots of human intergroup conflict may be evolutionarily quite ancient.


Psychologist Laurie Santos of Yale University led the research team. "One of the more troubling aspects of human nature is that we evaluate people differently depending on whether they're a member of our ingroup or outgroup," Santos said. "Pretty much every conflict in human history has involved people making distinctions on the basis of who is a member of their own race, religion, social class, and so on. The question we were interested in is: Where do these types of group distinctions come from?"

Roots Of Human Prejudice

The research results suggest that the distinctions humans make between us and them — and therefore the roots of human prejudice — may date back at least 25 million years, when humans and rhesus macaques shared a common ancestor.

"Social psychologists introduced the world to the idea that the immediate situation is hugely powerful in determining behavior, even intergroup feelings," said Mahzarin Banaji, of the Department of Psychology at Harvard University and a co-author of the paper.

"Evolutionary theorists have made us aware of our ancestral past. In this work, we weave the two together to show the importance of both of these influences at work"

"The bad news is that the tendency to dislike outgroup members appears to be evolutionarily quite old, and therefore may be less simple to eliminate than we'd like to think," Laurie Santos said.

"The good news, though, is that even monkeys seem to be flexible about who counts as a group member. If we humans can find ways to harness this evolved flexibility, it might allow us to become an even more tolerant species."
The answer, she adds, is that such biases have apparently been shaped by 25 million years of evolution and not just by human culture. The findings are reported in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

Santos and her lab studied the rhesus macaques living on an island off the coast of Puerto Rico. Like humans, monkeys in this population naturally form different social groups on the basis of family history. In order to assess whether monkeys made the same distinctions between ingroup and outgroup individuals, the researchers used a well-known tendency of animals to stare longer at novel or frightening things than at familiar or friendly things.

They presented subject monkeys with pictures of monkeys who were either in their social group or members of a different group. They found that monkeys stared longer at pictures of other monkeys who were outside their group, suggesting that monkeys spontaneously detect who is a stranger and who is a group member.

"What made this result even more remarkable" noted Neha Mahajan, a Yale graduate student who headed up this project, "is that monkeys in this population move around from group to group, so some of the monkeys who were outgroup were previously ingroup.

And yet, the result holds just as strongly for monkeys who have transferred groups only weeks earlier, suggesting that these monkeys are sensitive to who is currently to be thought of as an insider or an outsider. In other words, although monkeys divide the world into us versus them, they do so in a way that is flexible and is updated in real time."

Santos and colleagues then asked whether monkeys evaluated ingroup and outgroup members differently — did they associate these individuals automatically with "good" and "bad" respectively? To study this, they developed a monkey version of a test of implicit attitudes known as the Implicit Association Test (IAT).

In humans, this test measures the extent to which people show implicit biases against members of other groups. The researchers tested the same capacity in monkeys.
  • The researchers showed monkeys a sequence of photos in which photos of ingroup or outgroup monkey faces were paired with photos of either good things, such as fruits, or bad things, such as spiders.

  • The researchers then recorded the time monkeys spent looking at both kinds of sequences. The monkeys spent little time looking at sequences that included ingroup faces paired with good stuff like fruits or outgroup faces paired with bad stuff like spiders, suggesting that the monkeys treated these two kinds of stimuli as being similar.

  • On the other hand, the monkeys stared longer at sequences in which outgroup individuals were paired with positive objects like fruit suggesting that this association was unnatural to the monkeys.

Like humans, monkeys tend to spontaneously view ingroup members positively and outgroup members negatively. The research focused on establishing a baseline for further analysis and did not did not address the persistence of these judgments when enmeshed in questions of ethical priorities. For example, identification and suspicion of outgroup members can have an evolutionary advantage. If experience has taught that an outgroup can include known or suspected enemies out to do harm, then some caution can be beneficial for survival.

FundingThe work was funded the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), part of the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
ParticipationOther Yale authors of the paper are Margaret A. Martinez and Natashya Gutierrez. Researchers from Bar-Ilan University and Harvard also contributed to the study.
CitationThe evolution of intergroup bias: Perceptions and attitudes in rhesus macaques. Neha Mahajan, Margaret A. Martinez, Natashya L. Gutierrez, Gil Diesendruck, Mahzarin R. Banaji, and Laurie R. Santos. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2011; 100(3): 387-405. doi:10.1037/a0022459
Download PDF
Abstract

Social psychologists have learned a great deal about the nature of intergroup conflict and the attitudinal and cognitive processes that enable it. Less is known about where these processes come from in the first place. In particular, do our strategies for dealing with other groups emerge in the absence of human-specific experiences? One profitable way to answer this question has involved administering tests that are conceptual equivalents of those used with adult humans in other species, thereby exploring the continuity or discontinuity of psychological processes. We examined intergroup preferences in a nonhuman species, the rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta). We found the first evidence that a nonhuman species automatically distinguishes the faces of members of its own social group from those in other groups and displays greater vigilance toward outgroup members (Experiments 1–3). In addition, we observed that macaques spontaneously associate novel objects with specific social groups and display greater vigilance to objects associated with outgroup members (Experiments 4–5). Finally, we developed a looking time procedure — the Looking Time Implicit Association Test, which resembles the Implicit Association Test (Greenwald & Banaji, 1995) — and we discovered that macaques, like humans, automatically evaluate ingroup members positively and outgroup members negatively (Experiments 6–7). These field studies represent the first controlled experiments to examine the presence of intergroup attitudes in a nonhuman species. As such, these studies suggest that the architecture of the mind that enables the formation of these biases may be rooted in phylogenetically ancient mechanisms.

Keywords: intergroup bias, comparative cognition, rhesus monkeys.

TS-Si News ServiceThe TS-Si News Service is a collaborative effort by TS-Si.org editors, contributors, and corresponding institutions. The sources can include the cited individuals and organizations, as well as TS-Si.org staff contributions. Articles and news reports do not necessarily convey official positions of TS-Si, its partners, or affiliates.

We welcome your comments. Use the form below to leave a public comment or send private correspondence via the TS-Si Contact Page. We will not divulge any personal details or place you on a mailing list without your permission.

Quote this article on your site

To create link towards this article on your website,
copy and paste the text below in your page.




Preview :


Comments (0)

Write comment

Last Updated on Saturday, 19 March 2011 16:14
 
FeedFeed2CommentsDeliciousDiggFacebookTwitter