Off Tangent Comix
DNA Blueprints Guide The Construction Of Specific Human Structures
| For Most Women, The Relationship Still Matters Most |
|
|
| Living - Relationships | |||
| TS-Si News Service | |||
| Thursday, 26 June 2008 17:00 | |||
![]()
Durham, UK. Some ardent proponents of the sexual and feminist revolutions claimed women would be free to enjoy casual sex just as men always had. Yet, women report negative feelings after one-night stands, suggesting they are not well adapted to fleeting sexual encounters. Findings from a new study appear in Human Nature.
Emotion has a mediating role, providing flexibility (mediation) when when people interact and guide future interactions. Given the known differences between the sexes when it comes to competition and aggression, what is the role of emotional mediation when managing those differences?
The morning after the night before: Affective reactions to one-night stands among mated and unmated women and men. Anne Campbell. Human Nature 19(2) 157-173. doi: 10.1007 / s12110-008-9036-2. DOI 10.1007/s12110-008-9036-2. ISSN 1045-6767 (Print); 1936-4776 (Online)
Researchers have made several general assumptions about casual sex. For instance, men are more likely to reproduce and therefore to benefit from numerous short-term partners. For women, however, quality seems to be more important than quantity. Also, finding partners of high genetic quality is a stronger motivator for women than sheer number. Is it true that women are inclined to casual sex if there is a chance of forming a long-term relationship?
Professor Anne Campbell is a professor of psychology at Durham University (UK). Her research examines such questions from an evolutionary standpoint. Campbell looked at whether women have adapted to casual sex by examining their feelings following a one-night stand. If women have adapted, then although they may take part in casual sex less often than men because of their stricter criteria when selecting partners, they should rate the experience in a more positive manner. To test the theory, a total of 1743 men and women who had experienced a one-night stand were asked to rate both their positive and negative feelings the following morning, in an internet survey.
Reports by males were generally positive.
Overall, women’s feelings about one-night stands were more negative than those of me, with almost half of the women reporting negative feelings .
Professor Campbell says this is evolution at work. "In evolutionary terms women bear the brunt of parental care and it has been generally thought that it was to their advantage to choose their mate carefully and remain faithful to make sure that their mate had no reason to believe he was raising another man's child.
"Recently, biologists have suggested that females could benefit from mating with many men - it would increase the genetic diversity of their children, and, if a high quality man would not stay with them forever, they might at least get his excellent genes for their child." However, she said that if women were designed by evolution for short-term relationships, they would enjoy them more, and the survey suggested this was not the case. "Basic emotions guide us down pathways that have been advantageous for our ancestors," she says.
"What the woman seemed to object to was not the briefness of the encounter but the fact that the man did not seem to appreciate her," said Campbell. "The woman thought this lack of gratitude implied that she did this with anybody."
Campbell says that although women do not rate casual sex positively, the reason they still take part in it may be due to the menstrual cycle changes influencing their sexual motivation. Indeed, during the ovulatory phase (between days 10 to 18 of their cycle), women report increased sexual desire and arousal, with a preference for short-term partners.
Set as favorite
Bookmark
Email This
Comments (0)
![]() Write comment
|
|||
| Last Updated on Thursday, 26 June 2008 18:00 |







Professor Anne Campbell is a professor of psychology at
The TS-Si News Service is a collaborative effort by TS-Si.org editors, contributors, and corresponding institutions. The sources can include the cited individuals and organizations, as well as TS-Si.org staff contributions. Articles and news reports do not necessarily convey official positions of TS-Si, its partners, or affiliates. We welcome your comments. Use the form below to leave a public comment or send private correspondence via the 
The TS-Si News Service is a collaboration of TS-Si staff, contributors, and corresponding institutions. Contents do not necessarily convey official positions of TS-Si, its partners, or affiliates