Campaigns

Petition: remove women of transsexual / intersex history from the GLAAD Media Reference Guide.
[ link ] Also read Andrea Rosenfield's call for reform here at TS-Si.[ link ]

TS-Si supports open and immediate access to publicly funded research.
xkcd
TS-Si Site News
Do (or Did) Delayed Sexual Relations Matter? |
![]() |
![]() |
Living - Relationships | |||
TS-Si News Service | |||
Wednesday, 18 May 2011 09:00 | |||
Tampa, FL, USA. Psychologists have tested the assumption that delaying sex reduces sexual risk-taking and bad consequences, finding that in the end it doesn’t really matter whether you delay sex or not.
Sex education has one common message whether it focuses exclusively on abstinence or provides instruction on contraception and other topics: wait. The problem has been that no one had tested this assumption. In abstinence-only, students are exhorted to wait for sex until they’re married. In “comprehensive” or “abstinence-plus,” the idea is to delay sexual relations until ... later. “The underlying assumption is that delay reduces sexual risk-taking” — and with it unwanted pregnancies and sexually transmitted diseases, says University of South Florida psychologist Marina A. Bornovalova. “If they just wait, then they’ll be less likely to have multiple partners or get pregnant early.” Bornovalova and her colleagues tested the assumption and report their findings in the journal Psychological Science.
The researchers say what they found should spark serious rethinking wherever sex educators seek facts as their guide. Numerous runs of the data led to the same conclusion: “You take two twins who share 100 percent of their genes. One has sex at 15 and one at 20. You compare them on risk-taking at 24 — and they don’t differ.” Yes, there’s a correlation between early sexual initiation (defined in this study as 16 or younger) and later sexual risk-taking. But, as a causal factor for sexual risk-taking — multiple partners, drug and alcohol use during sexual encounters, or unprotected intercourse — “it doesn’t really matter whether you delay sex or not.” So why does someone end up sexually promiscuous? The researchers think it’s a combination of genetic factors — such as the strong inherited tendency to be impulsive or anti-social — and environmental ones, such as poverty or troubled family life. Most important, though — biology and life experience both give rise to early sexual initiation and risk-taking later on. The former does not cause the latter. The psychologists aren’t advocating sex at a very early age. It very well might have other harmful effects on a teenager, such as depression or poor school performance. “But if our goal is to reduce sexual risk-taking, we need to be focusing on something else,” says Bornovalova. More study is needed to zero in on what that something else is. But for now, one thing should be clear to the people writing sex ed curricula: “Whatever is causing sexual risk-taking, it is not early sexual initiation.” ParticipationC
The c-authors were Brooke M. Huibregtse, Marina A. Bornovalova, and Matt McGue at the University of South Florida, by William Iacono of the University of Minnesota, and Brian Hicks of the University of Michigan.
CitationTesting the Role of Adolescent Sexual Initiation in Later-Life Sexual Risk Behavior: A Longitudinal Twin Design. Brooke M. Huibregtse, Marina A. Bornovalova, Brian M. Hicks, Matt McGue, William G. Iacono. Psychological Science 2011; In press.
To create link towards this article on your website, copy and paste the text below in your page. Preview :
Bookmark
Email This
Trackback(0)
Comments (1)
Write comment
|
|||
Last Updated on Wednesday, 18 May 2011 12:36 |