FeedFeed2CommentsDeliciousDiggFacebookTwitter
Leave a comment.
Campaigns
Sign the petition to remove the umbrella use of the term 'transgender' to cover women of transsexual / intersex history.
Petition: remove women of transsexual / intersex history from the GLAAD Media Reference Guide.
[ link ] Also read Andrea Rosenfield's call for reform here at TS-Si.[ link ]
TS-Si supports open access to publicly funded research.
TS-Si supports open and immediate access to publicly funded research.
xkcd
TS-Si Site News
TS-Si Reboot Gets Underway
Gender Roles and Precarious Manhood Print E-mail
Living - Relationships
TS-Si News Service   
Tuesday, 03 May 2011 09:00
Tampa, FL, USA. Manhood is a “precarious” status — difficult to earn and easy to lose. And when it’s threatened, men see aggression as a good way to hold onto it.

“Gender is social,” says Jennifer Bosson. “Men know this. They are powerfully concerned about how they appear in other people’s eyes.” And the more concerned they are, the more they will suffer psychologically when their manhood feels violated.


Jennifer K. Bosson and Joseph A. Vandello are psychologists at the University of South Florida (USF). Their findings appear in the journal Current Directions in Psychological Science.

“Aggression is a manhood-restoring tactic”

Jennifer Bosson says that this area of research gives psychological evidence to sociological and political theories calling gender a social, not a biological, phenomenon.

And it begins to demonstrate the negative effects of gender on men — depression, anxiety, low self-esteem, or violence.

The work has also changed Bosson personally.

“When I was younger I felt annoyed by my male friends who would refuse to hold a pocketbook or say whether they thought another man was attractive. I thought it was a personal shortcoming that they were so anxious about their manhood.”

“Now I feel much more sympathy for men.”
Gender role violation can be a big thing, like losing a job, or a little thing, like being asked to braid hair in a laboratory. In several studies, Bosson and her colleagues used the braiding hair task to force men to behave in a “feminine” manner, and recorded what happened.

In one study, some men braided hair; others did the more masculine — or gender-neutral — task of braiding rope. Given the options afterwards of punching a bag or doing a puzzle, the hair-braiders overwhelmingly chose the former. When one group of men braided hair and others did not, and all punched the bag, the hair-braiders punched harder. When they all braided hair and only some got to punch, the non-punchers evinced more anxiety on a subsequent test.

When men use this tactic, or consider it, they tend to feel they were compelled by outside forces to do so. Bosson and her colleagues gave men and women a mock police report, in which either a man or a woman hit someone of their own sex after that person taunted them, insulting their manhood (or womanhood).
  • Why did the person get violent?

  • When the protagonist was a woman, both sexes attributed the act to character traits, such as immaturity; the women also said this about the male aggressors.

  • But when the aggressor was a man, the men mostly believed he was provoked; humiliation forced him to defend his manhood.

Interestingly, people tend to feel manhood is defined by achievements, not biology. Womanhood, on the other hand, is seen primarily as a biological state. So manhood can be “lost” through social transgressions, whereas womanhood is “lost” only by physical changes, such as menopause.

Who judges manhood so stringently? “Women are not the main punishers of gender role violations,” says Bosson. Other men are.

CitationPrecarious Manhood and Its Links to Action and Aggression . Jennifer K. Bosson and Joseph A. Vandello. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2011; 20(2): 82-86. doi:10.1177/0963721411402669

Abstract

Unlike womanhood, manhood is widely viewed as a status that is elusive (it must be earned) and tenuous (it must be demonstrated repeatedly through actions). This focus on the structure—rather than the content—of gender roles can shed new light on men’s use of action and physical aggression. Here, we review theory and research connecting manhood, action, and aggression. We interpret men’s aggression and aggressive displays as behaviors that effectively demonstrate manhood and thus quell men’s concerns about their gender status. Moreover, we suggest that situational and cultural factors that heighten the precariousness of manhood also increase the likelihood of male aggression.

Keywords: manhood, gender roles, physical aggression, human sex differences.

TS-Si News ServiceThe TS-Si News Service is a collaborative effort by TS-Si.org editors, contributors, and corresponding institutions. The sources can include the cited individuals and organizations, as well as TS-Si.org staff contributions. Articles and news reports do not necessarily convey official positions of TS-Si, its partners, or affiliates.

We welcome your comments. Use the form below to leave a public comment or send private correspondence via the TS-Si Contact Page. We will not divulge any personal details or place you on a mailing list without your permission.


TS-Si is dedicated to the acceptance, medical treatment, and legal protection of individuals correcting the misalignment of their brains and their anatomical sex, while supporting their transition into society as hormonally reconstituted and surgically corrected citizens.

Tweet
Quote this article on your site

To create link towards this article on your website,
copy and paste the text below in your page.




Preview :


Trackback(0)
Comments (1)

Write comment
smaller | larger

Last Updated on Tuesday, 03 May 2011 08:40
 
FeedFeed2CommentsDeliciousDiggFacebookTwitter