Off Tangent Comix
See our Annotated List of DSM-related news, research reports, analyses, and opinion pieces.
Visit the TS-Si Article Archive for reports on science, medicine, government, society, and other topics.
DNA Blueprints Guide The Construction Of Specific Human Structures
Chad Mirkin discusses using DNA to build a three-dimensional structure out of gold, likening the process to building a house. Starting with basic materials such as bricks, wood, siding, stone and shingles, a construction team can build many different types of houses out of the same building blocks.
The article includes an audio recording of the full interview. Photo courtesy of the UCSD School of Medicine.
| Does WPATH Really Have a Mandate to Speak on Behalf of HBS Transsexuals? |
|
|
| Opinion - Private Matters | ||||||
| Joanne Proctor | ||||||
| Friday, 28 November 2008 21:00 | ||||||
Aotearoa (New Zealand). In 2001 the organization that would later morph into the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) was still presenting to the world as the International Harry Benjamin Gender Dysphoria Association. (HBGDA) In the circumstances its use of Benjamin's name was more than a little ironic. However it was under this name that the organization published its sixth standards of care (SOC). (see below) The 2001 document amounts a public rebuttal of Benjamin's original work. Since the rebuttal lays out the rational for the organization's denial of true or primary transsexualism as a valid diagnosis, an examination of the reasons given, and which apparently lead to that event is worthwhile. If nothing else, the reason why HBS activists treat WPATH with contempt will become apparent.
The locus of the alleged deception lay in chapter two of The Transsexual Phenomenon, where Benjamin delineated Transsexualism from transvestism.
Benjamin went on to clarify the sex/gender distinction and state the obvious: that whilst transvestism was solely a gender issue, transsexualism was both. [N5]
Anybody with experience of Harry Benjamin's Syndrome (primary transsexualism) will easily recognize some significant part of themselves in Benjamin's description. Obviously there were other, more legitimate explanations for the so-called lying. Such as:
Unfortunately, despite the fact that it is perfectly possible to use somebody else's description without lying, the allegations stuck.
Not unlike the promulgation of an urban legend they percolated for the next ten years. Then, in 2001, The HBIGDA 6th Standards of Care contained this explanation.
Anyone who recognizes themselves in the majority of these criteria will take little comfort from being rare, and less from the accusation that they are “probably falsifying their history.” Shortly after this revised SOC the organization changed its name to WPATH (World Professional Association for Transgender Health.) By then it had abandoned any mandate or authority to offer guidance on the treatment of HBS afflicted individuals. It has done nothing to recover the mandate since, and those HBS activists who treat the organization and its Standards Of Care (SOC's) with disdain have perfectly valid grounds for doing so.
But WPATH's dismissal of Benjamin's work went back further than 2002, and has greater ramifications than the attitudes of a few activists.
Stoller's accusations of lying had surfaced in 1975. Stone's arguments were publicized in 1991. The beliefs had been around longer than WPATH itself. On their own they could not have been responsible for WPATH's Decision.
The International Journal of Transgenderism (IJT) put out a first issue in 1997. Its introductory statement contained the following explanation.
The journal's association with HBGDA (now WPATH) becomes clearer one paragraph down.
In fact those ties were close. Friedman Pfaifflin, was a founding editor of the IJT. The journal's first edition was arranged to coincide with the Harry Benjamin International Gender Dysphoria Association's 15th symposium in September of 1997, [N9] and Pfaifflin was a member of the HBIGDA board when the 1998 SOC (5th edition) was written.
In the light of the arguments coming from the IJT, and given the closeness of their ties, the HBGDA's rejection of Harry Benjamin, his work, and later his name becomes less than surprising. And the rational that most primary (HBS) transsexuals are lying? Or that the ones who are not are too few in number (to constitute a distinct group in their own right?). Bearing in mind the complete abdication of scientific integrity that bedevils Transgenderism, it seems likely that these were merely political face-savers for an already predetermined decision.
If that is the case their use was bizarre. Benjamin's claim that primary transsexualism (now self identified as Harry Benjamin's Syndrome to honor his name), was both a sex and a gender issue is becoming increasingly obvious as science unlocks new genetic secrets and reveals the workings of the brain. This process should leave both WPATH and the IJT looking increasingly redundant because they insist on trying to deal with complex sex biologies as gender issues, in direct contradiction to Benjamin's original findings.
But if they fail to make the leap from faith to science one thing seems clear. Primary (HBS) transsexuals will still need to substantially amend their personal histories, giving a more transvestite like narrative and withholding information about their brain/body conflict, if they want to access surgery without being considered liars. To date that has not been difficult: all they need to do is read the wealth of Transgender literature that organizations like the IJT make available.
That leads to an unfortunate result: the more often primaries repeat the transvestite story the more it is interpreted as a basic 'truth' by the dogma. Thus transgenderism becomes its own self fulfilling prophesy. Ever manufacturing a perceived reality that may have never existed were it not for the denial of biological variations, and society's obsession with gender role performance.
To make the situation doubly ironic, primary (Harry Benjamin Syndrome) transsexuals are required to engage in the very practice they were accused of when speaking honestly.
WPATH in particular, and transgenderism in general would cause less harm if they stuck to their knitting. They have clearly identified their interest in the gender side of the sex / gender distinction. The practice of taking complex biological variations in human sex formation and trying to treat them as behavioural matters smacks of fundamentalism and denial.
Finally, how can any organization claim to be a legitimate voice on behalf of a minority, having first accused the minority of lying about its lived experience?
Notes[N1] Sex and Gender, Volume II: The Transsexual Experiment: 2. Robert J. Stoller. London: The Hogarth Press Ltd (10 Jul 1975). ISBN-10: 0701204001; ISBN-13: 978-0701204006.
[N2] Someone Else's Gender. D. Bates. (Ph.D. diss., Waikato University, 2002), 52. Waikato University Press: Unpublished. [N3] The Empire Strikes Back: A Post transsexual Manifesto. Sandy Stone. In: Body Guards: The Cultural Politics of Gender Ambiguity. Epstein, J. & Straub, K. (eds.), New York: Routledge. 1991. [N4] The transsexual phenomenon. Harry S. Benjamin. New York: Julian Press. 1966. [N5] Ibid. [N6] Harry Benjamin International Gender Dysphoria Association's Standards Of Care For Gender Identity Disorders, Sixth Version. February, 2001. [N7] Pfaefflin F., Colemann E.. Introduction. IJT I(1). 1997. [N8] ibid. [N9] ibid.
Set as favorite
Bookmark
Email This
Comments (7)
![]() Write comment
|
||||||
| Last Updated on Friday, 28 November 2008 23:50 |






Aotearoa (New Zealand). In 2001 the organization that would later morph into the 

The TS-Si News Service is a collaborative effort by TS-Si.org editors, contributors, and corresponding institutions. The sources can include the cited individuals and organizations, as well as TS-Si.org staff contributions. Articles and news reports do not necessarily convey official positions of TS-Si, its partners, or affiliates. We welcome your comments. Use the form below to leave a public comment or send private correspondence via the 
The TS-Si News Service is a collaboration of TS-Si staff, contributors, and corresponding institutions. Contents do not necessarily convey official positions of TS-Si, its partners, or affiliates