FeedFeed2CommentsDeliciousDiggFacebookTwitter
Leave a comment.
Campaigns
Sign the petition to remove the umbrella use of the term 'transgender' to cover women of transsexual / intersex history.
Petition: remove women of transsexual / intersex history from the GLAAD Media Reference Guide.
[ link ] Also read Andrea Rosenfield's call for reform here at TS-Si.[ link ]
TS-Si supports open access to publicly funded research.
TS-Si supports open and immediate access to publicly funded research.
xkcd
TS-Si Site News
TS-Si Reboot Gets Underway
Attention Economics and Scientific Success Print E-mail
SciMed - Horizons
TS-Si News Service   
Saturday, 07 May 2011 09:00
Zürich, Switzerland. Given that attention is a scarce resource in today's society, and if attention is paid only to people who are already at the top, how are scientific revolutions possible?

This is particularly important since success at innovation leads to the rich-get-richer effect and a tendency of many successful people to be content with their celebrity and material rewards.


Publication of a new report investigating the careers of Nobel Prize winners provides insight into this phenomenon. Dirk Helbing is a professor at ETH Zurich, and Bernardo Huberman, the Director of the Social Computing Lab at HP. They note "We live in a world where information overload is normal. Attention is precious. The money goes where the attention is. And often people are willing to trade money for the attention of others."

Attention Economics

Citation: Success

In everyday life, understanding the laws of attention economics is a prerequisite of material success.

As a study of publications by Nobel Prize laureates shows, the same generally is true for scientific achievements.

Success in science is measured in citations. That is, the more citations by others a researcher collects in important journals, the more praise can follow.

In a sense, the accumulation of citations is for scientists what bonuses are for bankers, or, likewise, what applause means for artists.
When economists study the attention of humans as a scarce commodity, they solve various information management problems by applying economic theory. Commonly, the concept of attention is defined as "focused mental engagement on a particular item of information", used as the decision point for action.

Herbert Simon noted the information-rich world that consumes the attention of recipients from the overabundance of sources that compete for that attention to the detriment of other alternatives. He argued that designers built of information systems that were very good at providing increasing quantities of information to people, but neglected to filter out what was unneeded or unwanted from the end product.

This phenomenon at has, over time, entered common conversation as information overload, which has been popularized as economic in nature (i.e., resource wasting).

Boosting Nobel Prizes

Information overload is known in science as well. The number of research articles exceeds by far the total that a researcher can read in a single life. Additionally, scientific fields of research are usually dominated by a few outstanding scientists that attract most of the attention. In this almost hostile environment, how can unknown researchers bring about a paradigm shift?

How are groundbreaking discoveries feasible at all? A recent publication by the teams of Dirk Helbing of ETH Zurich and Santo Fortunato of the Institute for Scientific Interchange (ISI) in Turin throws light on this matter. In their paper, the researchers investigate several million citations in the scientific area, references to Nobel Prize laureates in particular.

"Remarkably, innovations are able to overcome the rich-gets-richer dynamics," Helbing says. The explanation of this phenomenon is based on a new key parameter, the so-called boost factor. "Sometimes, a paper gets cited overwhelmingly often and thus overcomes the rich-gets-richer effect. We then see citation cascades," Helbing says.

These papers are called landmark papers. The boost factor represents a powerful instrument in accurately describing the careers of researchers. Its peaks precisely indicate the landmark papers.

New Talents

Citations have become a widespread method to measure scientific excellence. For example, they are frequently used in academic recruitment procedures. Furthermore, they play an important role in university rankings and for the distribution of funds among scholars and scientific institutions.

However, the boost factor proposed by the teams of Helbing and Fortunato goes beyond the indices that are commonly used in its sensitivity to identifying landmark events: The sharp peaks allow one to identify scientific breakthroughs and talents much earlier than through classical citation analysis. The authors propose that the boost factor could be used together with other measures to evaluate the performance of scientists.

Interestingly, the boost factor also shows that, when a groundbreaking paper receives abundant attention, the scientist's body of work overall enjoys a greater impact. A specific paper thus influences even the success of publications in the past. The benefitting pieces of work do not even have to be from the same area of research.

"Similar feedback effects are likely to affect the influence of a politician, or the price of a product," suggests Helbing. "Otherwise brands would not be so important."

A Self-organized Critical System?

Interestingly, the statistical distribution of the peaks of the boost factor looks like a power law. This suggests that the boosts may reach any possible size. "In fact, we observe everything, from small cascades that reflect quasi-continuous scientific progress all the way up to scientific revolutions, which change our perception of the world fundamentally," says Helbing. Nobel Prize winners, for instance, usually have a significantly larger boost compared to other scientists.

This power law behavior indicates that science undergoes phase transitions, where sudden systemic shifts occur. For example, new scientific concepts such as Quantum Mechanics or Einstein's Theory of Relativity may be understood as paradigm shifts. Furthermore, the scientific system seems to drive itself toward the tipping point, where citation avalanches occur on all scales. "It's only for this reason that innovations sometimes have a chance to overcome established paradigms," concludes Helbing.

FundingA.M., S.L. and D.H. were partially supported by the Future and Emerging Technologies programme FP7-COSI-ICT of the European Commission through the project QLectives. Y.-H. E. and S. F. gratefully acknowledge ICTeCollective, grant 238597 of the European Commission.
CitationHow Citation Boosts Promote Scientific Paradigm Shifts and Nobel Prizes. Amin Mazloumian, Young-Ho Eom, Dirk Helbing, Sergi Lozano, Santo Fortunato. PLoS ONE 2011; 6(5): e18975. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0018975
Download PDF
Abstract

Nobel Prizes are commonly seen to be among the most prestigious achievements of our times. Based on mining several million citations, we quantitatively analyze the processes driving paradigm shifts in science. We find that groundbreaking discoveries of Nobel Prize Laureates and other famous scientists are not only acknowledged by many citations of their landmark papers. Surprisingly, they also boost the citation rates of their previous publications. Given that innovations must outcompete the rich-gets-richer effect for scientific citations, it turns out that they can make their way only through citation cascades. A quantitative analysis reveals how and why they happen. Science appears to behave like a self-organized critical system, in which citation cascades of all sizes occur, from continuous scientific progress all the way up to scientific revolutions, which change the way we see our world. Measuring the “boosting effect” of landmark papers, our analysis reveals how new ideas and new players can make their way and finally triumph in a world dominated by established paradigms. The underlying “boost factor” is also useful to discover scientific breakthroughs and talents much earlier than through classical citation analysis, which by now has become a widespread method to measure scientific excellence, influencing scientific careers and the distribution of research funds. Our findings reveal patterns of collective social behavior, which are also interesting from an attention economics perspective. Understanding the origin of scientific authority may therefore ultimately help to explain how social influence comes about and why the value of goods depends so strongly on the attention they attract.

TS-Si News ServiceThe TS-Si News Service is a collaborative effort by TS-Si.org editors, contributors, and corresponding institutions. The sources can include the cited individuals and organizations, as well as TS-Si.org staff contributions. Articles and news reports do not necessarily convey official positions of TS-Si, its partners, or affiliates.

We welcome your comments. Use the form below to leave a public comment or send private correspondence via the TS-Si Contact Page. We will not divulge any personal details or place you on a mailing list without your permission.


TS-Si is dedicated to the acceptance, medical treatment, and legal protection of individuals correcting the misalignment of their brains and their anatomical sex, while supporting their transition into society as hormonally reconstituted and surgically corrected citizens.

Tweet
Quote this article on your site

To create link towards this article on your website,
copy and paste the text below in your page.




Preview :


Trackback(0)
Comments (1)

Write comment
smaller | larger

Last Updated on Sunday, 08 May 2011 12:56
 
FeedFeed2CommentsDeliciousDiggFacebookTwitter