FeedFeed2CommentsDeliciousDiggFacebookTwitter
Leave a comment.
Campaigns
Sign the petition to remove the umbrella use of the term 'transgender' to cover women of transsexual / intersex history.
Petition: remove women of transsexual / intersex history from the GLAAD Media Reference Guide.
[ link ] Also read Andrea Rosenfield's call for reform here at TS-Si.[ link ]
TS-Si supports open access to publicly funded research.
TS-Si supports open and immediate access to publicly funded research.
xkcd
TS-Si Site News
Situs Interruptus. TS-Si has returned to operation and is fully functional.
Institute of Medicine LGBT Health Study Call Impacts TS Population Print E-mail
SciMed - Horizons
TS-Si News Service   
Saturday, 02 April 2011 15:00
LGBT In Health Studies?Washington, DC, USA. A special committee of the influential Institute of Medicine (IOM) calls for attention to the specific health needs of groups often combined into a single LGBT entity for research and advocacy purposes.

The IOM cites difficulties when synthesizing data about the various groups combined under a single LGBT classification, since "studies and surveys use a variety of ways to define them". It recommends vigorous population profiling and health assessments that have direct relevance for addressing the health needs of both transsexual and transgender population groups.


The committee says the scarcity of research yields an incomplete picture of LGBT health status and needs, which is further fragmented by the tendency to treat sexual and gender minorities as a single homogeneous group. The report recommendations include a call for researchers to proactively engage lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people in health studies and collect data on these populations to identify and better understand the unique health conditions that affect them.

Transsexual Research

Research opportunities offered by patients with a history of misaligned neurobiology and genitalia

Men and women who have corrected the misalignment of their anatomical sex are a unique — but virtually unutilized — resource for research studies. Men with such histories are unencumbered with long-term exposure to testosterone, while the women do not have menstrual histories and are non-menopausal.

Both men and women in this population group exhibit the measurable consequences of hormone therapy (HT) and related medication. Moreover, the group identification does not depend on race or other criteria susceptible to psychosocial misinterpretations.

For example, even though the women have never been through menopause, doctors, endocrinologists and other medical practitioners still use traditional practice and deny the appropriate types of estrogen and sufficient dosages to their MtF patients when prescribing hormones.

This practice derives from studies of women who have been prescribed hormone combinations with known deleterious effects and projecting those effects to all estrogen-inclusive regimens.

It is a biased practice based on uninformed presumptions that such patients seek pretense and can not be considered as women themselves. Much of the confusion derives from a failure by practitioners to distinguish between transsexuality and and paraphilia.

However, the existence of a qualified post-op population offers the opportunity for informative baseline comparisons when studying the unique health concerns of all men and women, regardless of their birth circumstances.

— ssg & ljt
The committee report provides a thorough compilation of what is known about the health of each of these groups at different stages of life and outlines an agenda for the research and data collection necessary to form a fuller understanding.

Robert Graham, the IOM committee chair, is professor of family medicine and public health sciences and Robert and Myfanwy Smith Chair, department of family medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine (Cincinnati, Ohio). Graham says "It's easy to assume that because we are all humans, gender, race, or other characteristics of study participants shouldn't matter in health research, but they certainly do," an observation supported now by many years of research and clinical practice.

"It was only when researchers made deliberate efforts to engage women and racial and ethnic minorities in studies that we discovered differences in how some diseases occur in and affect specific populations." The removal of ideological bias has permitted a more evidence-based approach. "Routine collection of information on race and ethnicity has expanded our understanding of conditions that are more prevalent among various groups or that affect them differently."

"We should strive for attention to and engagement of sexual and gender minorities in health research."
  • Because LGBT individuals make up a minority of the population, researchers face challenges in recruiting sufficient numbers of these individuals in general population surveys to yield meaningful data.

  • Stigma experienced by gender and sexual minorities can make them reluctant to disclose their orientation, worsening the problem.

"It is difficult to synthesize data about these groups when studies and surveys use a variety of ways to define them."
  • Because demographic data provide the foundation for understanding any population's status and needs, federally funded surveys should proactively collect data on sexual orientation and gender identity, just as they routinely gather information on race and ethnicity, the report says.

  • Information on patients' sexual orientation and gender identity also should be collected in electronic health records, provided that privacy concerns can be satisfactorily addressed, the committee said.

  • The National Institutes of Health (NIH) should support the development of standardized measures of sexual orientation and gender identity for use in federal surveys and other means of data collection.

  • In addition, NIH should provide training opportunities in conducting research with LGBT populations. Training should engage researchers who are not specifically studying LGBT health issues as well as those who are.

  • The NIH also should use its policy on the inclusion of women and racial and ethnic minorities in clinical research as a model to encourage grant applicants to address how their proposed studies will include or exclude sexual and gender minorities.

Conclusion

The overall goal is to build a more solid evidence base for health concerns that will go beyond the benefit to LGBT individuals and add to the repository of health information that pertains to all people.

The committee's general conclusion is that "lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender individuals have unique health experiences and needs, but as a nation, we do not know exactly what these experiences and needs are." This admisson of ignorance led to to the call for advancing the understanding of the health needs of all individuals and specific recommendations to collect more data on poulation demographics and improved methods for collecting and analyzing the data.

The committee made special note of the difficulties involved when trying to gain increased participation by sexual and gender minorities in research. As noted above, the members say the "National Institutes of Health (NIH) should support the development of standardized measures of sexual orientation and gender identity for use in federal surveys and other means of data collection".

ParticipationThe IOM Committee on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Health Issues and Research Gaps and Opportunities

The Institute of Medicine (IOM) was established in 1970 as the health arm of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS), which was chartered under President Abraham Lincoln in 1863.

The NAS has since expanded into what is collectively known as the National Academies, which comprises the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, the National Research Council, and the Institute of Medicine (IOM).

This new report was guided by the IOM Board on Health Sciences Policy and the Board on the Health of Select Populations. Members of the special committee were drawn from a pool of experts and advisors that covered a large number of overlapping disciplines.

Among the many and overlapping subject areas, the expertise encompassed biology, economics, education, ethnicity, gender, genetics, gynecology, healthcare, medicine, methodology, nursing, obstetrics, pediatrics, policy development, population studies, psychiatry, psychology, race, sexuality, training, and women's studies (listed here in alphabetical order).
FundingThe study was sponsored by the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
CitationThe Health of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender People: Building a Foundation for Better Understanding. Committee on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Health Issues and Research Gaps and Opportunities; Board on the Health of Select Populations; Institute of Medicine. The National Academies Press 2011. ISBN-10: 0-309-21061-5; ISBN-13: 978-0-309-21061-4
Download PDF (Report Brief & Contacts)
At a time when lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender individuals— often referred to under the umbrella acronym LGBT—are becoming more visible in society and more socially acknowledged, clinicians and researchers are faced with incomplete information about their health status. While LGBT populations often are combined as a single entity for research and advocacy purposes, each is a distinct population group with its own specific health needs. Furthermore, the experiences of LGBT individuals are not uniform and are shaped by factors of race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, geographical location, and age, any of which can have an effect on health-related concerns and needs.

While some research about the health of LGBT populations has been conducted, researchers still have a great deal to learn and face a number of challenges in understanding the health needs of LGBT populations. To help assess the state of the science, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) asked the Institute of Medicine (IOM) to assess current knowledge of the health status of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender populations; to identify research gaps and opportunities; and to outline a research agenda to help NIH focus its research in this area.

A committee of experts was convened by the IOM to consider this task, and its findings are presented in its report.

The IOM finds that to advance understanding of the health needs of all LGBT individuals, researchers need more data about the demographics of these populations, improved methods for collecting and analyzing data, and an increased participation of sexual and gender minorities in research. Building a more solid evidence base for LGBT health concerns will not only benefit LGBT individuals, but also add to the repository of health information we have that pertains to all people.



TS-Si is dedicated to the acceptance, medical treatment, and legal protection of individuals correcting the misalignment of their brains and their anatomical sex, while supporting their transition into society as hormonally reconstituted and surgically corrected citizens.

Tweet
Quote this article on your site

To create link towards this article on your website,
copy and paste the text below in your page.




Preview :


Trackback(0)
Comments (5)

Write comment
smaller | larger

Last Updated on Saturday, 02 April 2011 14:19
 
FeedFeed2CommentsDeliciousDiggFacebookTwitter