FeedFeed2CommentsDeliciousDiggFacebookTwitter
Leave a comment.
Campaigns
Sign the petition to remove the umbrella use of the term 'transgender' to cover women of transsexual / intersex history.
Petition: remove women of transsexual / intersex history from the GLAAD Media Reference Guide.
[ link ] Also read Andrea Rosenfield's call for reform here at TS-Si.[ link ]
TS-Si supports open access to publicly funded research.
TS-Si supports open and immediate access to publicly funded research.
Diversions
TS-Si Site News
TS-Si Reboot Gets Underway
VA Racial Disparity Persists Despite Quality Gains Print E-mail
SciMed - Healthcare
TS-Si News Service   
Monday, 11 April 2011 09:00
Providence, RI. Two new studies of standard quality metrics at medical centers operated by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) show that the system has made substantial improvements in quality, in some cases providing substantially better care than is available in private insurance plans.

But for all its improvements, the VA hasn’t been able to close a gap between the health outcomes of white and black patients.


As recently as the 1990s, the VA health care system had a subpar reputation for quality, but two new studies of standard quality metrics show that the system that cares for more than 5 million patients has improved markedly in the last decade.



Amal Trivedi is assistant professor of community health at Brown University and a physician at the Providence VA Medical Center.
In one study, published in the journal Medical Care, [C1] Amal Trivedi found that the VA’s care for seniors is consistently better than what is available through private Medicare Advantage plans, but another analysis published in the April issue of Health Affairs shows that while care has improved for both black and white patients, racial disparities persist in health outcomes.

Trivedi, who receives some of his funding from the VA, said each peer-reviewed analysis was based on widely accepted quality indicators in the health care industry. The measures indicate whether care providers followed recommended processes given the patient’s condition and whether patients experienced favorable outcomes.

For example, for patients with diabetes, quality care requires both testing and controlling their cholesterol. In his studies, Trivedi and his co-authors analyzed millions of documented cases of care delivery.

The race gap

For the analysis published in Health Affairs, [C2] Trivedi studied 10 quality indicators in the records of more than 1.1 million veterans. He found that during the last decade, VA doctors became significantly more likely to provide better care to members of each racial group, both for process (ordering appropriate tests) and outcomes (obtaining improved results).

But because care for black veterans did not increase in quality faster than it did for white veterans, the disparity that existed before has remained stubbornly in place.

“The disparities that we saw were for outcomes measures, or getting the right result, as opposed to the provider doing the correct thing,” said Trivedi. For example, in 2009, 63 percent of black veterans with diabetes had controlled cholesterol compared to 71 percent of white veterans, a disparity of 8 percentage points. In 2005, the disparity was 9 percentage points.

While the disparity didn’t change, the quality of care did. Among patients with diabetes, only 52 percent of black veterans and only 61 percent of white veterans had controlled cholesterol in 2005. Between 2005 and 2009, whites and blacks saw 10 and 11 percentage-point jumps in better outcomes respectively.

Trivedi and co-authors Regina Grebla, Steven Wright, and Donna Washington said that the disparity is not found in just a few VA medical centers, but persists widely throughout the system. The study can’t account for why the gap has remained even though the VA has improved quality overall, but the data present the VA with the opportunity to recognize the disparity and focus on it.

“I think it’s important for all health systems, not just the VA, to track performance for vulnerable groups,” he said. Other research, he said, has shown that racial disparities on similar measures is 1.3 to 2 times higher in the Medicare system than at the VA.

Advantage for seniors

Overall, the VA trumps private Medicare plans for patients 65 and older, according to the analysis Trivedi published in Medical Care last month. With co-author Grebla, Trivedi looked at comparable quality indicators in 293,000 VA records from 142 VA medical centers and more than 5.7 million from 305 Medicare Advantage plans between 2000 and 2007.

“On these indicators the VA outperformed private sector Medicare Advantage plans by a wide and increasing margin,” Trivedi said. “Quality is going to be a function of incentives and capabilities, and in the VA the incentives may be better aligned for providing high-quality care.”

In the study’s first year, Trivedi said, the VA system scored higher in 10 of 11 quality measures, missing the mark only on providing eye exams to diabetic patients, by 2.6 percentage points. After the first year, the VA’s quality improved faster than the private plans in a majority of indicators. By the final year in the study, Trivedi said, the VA surpassed Medicare Advantage providers in all 12 measures he studied. The VA’s higher quality margin in 2007 ranged from 4.3 percentage points in the case of testing LDL cholesterol among patients with coronary artery disease to 30.8 percentage points in providing colorectal cancer screening.

In all 12 measures, the VA also had lower quality disparities than private plans between patients living in areas with the highest and lowest incomes and education levels. For example, for diabetic patients, the quality difference in controlling blood sugar between patients living in the richest and poorest areas was 0.6 percentage points in the VA system, compared to 8.1 percentage points in Medicare Advantage plans.

“The VA holds clinicians and managers accountable for quality, and emphasizes primary care and health information technology,” Trivedi said. “These practices can also be used by private-sector systems to improve care.”

CitationIn addition to the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation funded the studies published in Medical Care and Health Affairs.
Citation[C1] Quality and Equity of Care in the Veterans Affairs Health-Care System and in Medicare Advantage Health Plans. Amal N. Trivedi, Regina C. Grebla. Medical Care 2011; 1. doi:10.1097/MLR.0b013e31820fb0f6

Abstract

Background.

After an organizational transformation in the mid-1990s, the quality of care in the Veterans Affairs health-care system (VA) compared favorably with the quality of care in some private-sector settings. Whether this performance advantage has persisted, and also its relation to geographic and socioeconomic variations in care, is unknown.

Objective.

We compared the quality and equity of care for older adults in the VA with that delivered in Medicare Advantage (MA) health plans using the same performance measures.

Research Design.

Cross-sectional comparison.

Subjects.

A total of 293,554 observations from enrollees in 142 VA medical centers (VAMCs) and 5,768,573 observations from enrollees in 305 MA plans.

Measurements.

Adherence to quality measures assessing diabetes, cardiovascular, and cancer screening care from 2000 to 2007.

Results.

The VA outperformed MA plans on 10 of 11 quality measures in the initial study year, and on all 12 measures in the final year. In 2006 and 2007, adjusted differences between the VA and MA ranged from 4.3 percentage points (95% CI, 3.2-5.4) for cholesterol testing in coronary heart disease to 30.8 percentage points (95% CI, 28.1-33.5) for colorectal cancer screening. For 9 of 12 measures, socioeconomic disparities (defined as the difference in performance rates between persons in the highest and lowest quartiles of area-level income and education) were lower in the VA than in MA. Across all measures, the mean interquartile range of performance was 6.7 percentage points for VAMCs and 14.5 percentage points for MA plans.

Conclusions.

Among persons aged 65 years or older, the VA health-care system significantly outperformed private-sector MA plans and delivered care that was less variable by site, geographic region, and socioeconomic status.



[C2] Despite Improved Quality Of Care In The Veterans Affairs Health System, Racial Disparity Persists For Important Clinical Outcomes. Amal N. Trivedi, Regina C. Grebla, Steven M. Wright, Donna L. Washington. Health Affairs 2011; 30(4): 707-715. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0074

Abstract

Both government and private health care systems have engaged in efforts to improve quality, but the effect of these initiatives on racial and ethnic disparities has not been well studied. In the decade following an organizational transformation, the Veterans Affairs (VA) health care system achieved substantial improvements in quality of care with minimal racial disparities for most process-of-care measures, such as rates of cholesterol screenings. However, in our study we observed a striking disconnect between high levels of performance on widely used process measures and modest levels of improvement in clinical outcomes, such as control of blood pressure, blood glucose, and cholesterol levels. We also observed a gap in clinical outcomes of as much as nine percentage points between African American veterans and white veterans. Almost all of the disparity in outcomes in the VA was explained by within-facility disparity, which suggests that VA medical centers need to measure and address racial gaps in care for their patient populations. Moreover, because cardiovascular disease and diabetes are major contributors to racial disparities in life expectancy, the findings of this study and others underscore the urgency of focused efforts to improve intermediate outcomes among African Americans in the VA and other settings.

Keywords: disparities, quality of care, military medicine.

TS-Si News ServiceThe TS-Si News Service is a collaborative effort by TS-Si.org editors, contributors, and corresponding institutions. The sources can include the cited individuals and organizations, as well as TS-Si.org staff contributions. Articles and news reports do not necessarily convey official positions of TS-Si, its partners, or affiliates.

We welcome your comments. Use the form below to leave a public comment or send private correspondence via the TS-Si Contact Page. We will not divulge any personal details or place you on a mailing list without your permission.


TS-Si is dedicated to the acceptance, medical treatment, and legal protection of individuals correcting the misalignment of their brains and their anatomical sex, while supporting their transition into society as hormonally reconstituted and surgically corrected citizens.

Quote this article on your site

To create link towards this article on your website,
copy and paste the text below in your page.




Preview :


Trackback(0)
Comments (1)

Write comment

Last Updated on Sunday, 10 April 2011 18:37
 
FeedFeed2CommentsDeliciousDiggFacebookTwitter