TS-Si
is dedicated to the acceptance, medical
treatment, and legal
protection of individuals correcting the misalignment
of their brains and their anatomical sex, while supporting their transition
into society.
is dedicated to the acceptance, medical
treatment, and legal
protection of individuals correcting the misalignment
of their brains and their anatomical sex, while supporting their transition
into society.

TS-Si supports open and immediate access to publicly funded research.
Has Clean Hygiene Hurt Girls? |
![]() |
![]() |
Living - Health & Fitness | |||
TS-Si News Service | |||
Thursday, 27 January 2011 09:00 | |||
Corvallis, OR, USA. A researcher who studies science and gender differences thinks that the emphasis on keeping little girls neat and tidy may contribute to higher rates of certain diseases in adult women.
This well-documented link between increased hygiene and sanitation and higher rates of asthma, allergies and autoimmune disorders is known as the hygiene ![]() According to Oregon State University (OSU) philosopher Sharyn Clough, girls in western society are expected to be “all ribbon and curls”. Clough thinks researchers need to dig deeper. In her new study, published in the journal Social Science & Medicine, Clough points out that women have higher rates of allergies and asthma, and many autoimmune disorders. However, there is no agreed-upon explanation for these patterns. She offers a new explanation, documenting a variety of sociological and anthropological research that shows how our society socializes young girls differently from young boys. In particular, she notes, girls are generally kept from getting dirty compared to boys. Sharyn Clough, Ph.D. specializes in the philosophy of science and epistemology at Oregon State University (OSU). Her focus is on the intersection between these areas and feminist ![]() However, that doesn’t mean that parents should let their daughters go out into the back yard and eat dirt, Clough points out. “What I am proposing is new ways of looking at old studies,” she said. “The hygiene hypothesis is well-supported, but what I am hoping is that the epidemiologists and clinicians go back and examine their data through the lens of gender.” The hygiene hypothesis links the recent rise in incidence of asthma, allergies, and autoimmune disorders such as Crohn’s disease and rheumatoid arthritis, with particular geographical and environmental locations, in particular urban, industrialized nations. Many scholarly studies have noted that as countries become more industrial and urban, rates of these diseases rise. For instance, the rate of Crohn’s disease is on the rise in India as sanitation improves and industrialization increases. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has noted that asthma prevalence is higher among females (8.9 percent compared to 6.5 percent in males) and that women are more likely to die from asthma. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) statistics show that autoimmune diseases strike women three times more than men. A report by the Task Force on Gender, Multiple Sclerosis, and Autoimmunity shows that among people with multiple sclerosis and rheumatoid arthritis, the female to male ratio is between 2:1 and 3:1. With the disease lupus, nine times as many women are affected as men. Clough is a philosopher of science and epistemology, with a particular focus on feminist theory and gender differences. The focus of her work is to study scientific research and look for the implicit or hidden assumptions that guide that research. She believes the link between hygiene, gender and disease is not just a fluke. “We are just now beginning to learn about the complex relationship between bacteria and health,” she said. “More than 90 percent of the cells in our body are microbial rather than human. It would seem that we have co-evolved with bacteria. We need to explore this relationship more, and not just in terms of eating ‘pro-biotic’ yogurt.” That’s why Clough does not recommend that parents feed their daughters spoonfuls of dirt. Just one gram of ordinary uncontaminated soil contains 10 billion microbial cells, so the effects of ingesting dirt are unknown. “We obviously do not yet know enough to differentiate between helpful and harmful bacteria,” she said. However, Clough said she can easily join in the chorus of voices of health experts who say that more outdoor time for kids is good — even if that means the kids get a little dirty. “Getting everyone, both boys and girls, from an early age to be outdoors as much as possible is something I can get behind,” she said. CitationGender and the hygiene hypothesis. Sharyn Clough. Social Science & Medicine 2011; ePub ahead of print.
Abstract The hygiene hypothesis offers an explanation for the correlation, well-established in the industrialized nations of North and West, between increased hygiene and sanitation, and increased rates of asthma and allergies. Recent studies have added to the scope of the hypothesis, showing a link between decreased exposure to certain bacteria and parasitic worms, and increased rates of depression and intestinal auto-immune disorders, respectively. What remains less often discussed in the research on these links is that women have higher rates than men of asthma and allergies, as well as many auto-immune disorders, and also depression. The current paper introduces a feminist understanding of gender socialization to the epidemiological and immunological picture. That standards of cleanliness are generally higher for girls than boys, especially under the age of five when children are more likely to be under close adult supervision, is a robust phenomenon in industrialized nations, and some research points to a cross-cultural pattern. I conclude that, insofar as the hygiene hypothesis successfully identifies standards of hygiene and sanitation as mediators of immune health, then attention to the relevant patterns of gender socialization is important. The review also makes clear that adding a feminist analysis of gender socialization to the hygiene hypothesis helps explain variation in morbidity rates not addressed by other sources and responds to a number of outstanding puzzles in current research. Alternative explanations for the sex differences in the relevant morbidity rates are also discussed (e.g., the effects of estrogens). Finally, new sources of evidence for the hygiene hypothesis are suggested in the form of cross-cultural and other Quote this article on your site To create link towards this article on your website, copy and paste the text below in your page. Preview :
Bookmark
Email This
Comments (1)
Write comment
|
|||
Last Updated on Wednesday, 26 January 2011 20:29 |