TS-Si is dedicated to the acceptance, medical treatment, and legal protection of individuals correcting the misalignment of their brains and their anatomical sex, while supporting their transition into society as hormonally reconstituted and surgically corrected citizens.
| Transvestism Is a Narcotic Drug |
|
|
| Opinion - Guest Columns | |||
| Evangelina Carters | |||
| Thursday, 23 December 2010 09:00 | |||
Somewhere, Planet Earth. Transvestism or cross dressing, are the same thing and quite simply are acts performed for sexual gratification. Like pretty much all similar acts it has variations on its theme. It also contains depths of “need” particularly in its initial stages.Essentially transvestism is the twisting or misdirecting of sexual targeting and is far more common in males. Or, to put it another way, the sexual attraction in men becomes focussed not on a female but on that which surrounds the female or may even be on an object. Often the association becomes fixed when a male first becomes aroused sexually. The male transvestite who begins by gaining sexual gratification through wearing items of female clothing and will progress slowly through multiple stages and levels of cross dressing to obtain ever higher levels of excitement. Transvestism acts like a narcotic drug. I’ve watched as men in the early stages of cross dressing gradually progress from occasionally wearing their wives underwear for sexual kicks, through to creating a full female image. It seems never to stop there but instead tends to progress, ever closer to creating a more convincing feminine image until there is nowhere else to go, save hormones and SRS to create the ultimate pass. In other words naked in front of a mirror or better still in sexual intercourse with either sex. It may take years in some cases as the individual becomes ever more curious about even greater levels of cross gender activity until eventually and seemingly inevitably they seek more permanency to the cross dressing. In other words full time and eventually may even move on to surgical procedures. At this point in old terms they would be described as “transgender” Currently everyone claims to be “transsexual.” It seems it is forgotten that transsexuals are born and that it is not a stage that transvestites progress towards. I am a musician and have been all my life and having worked in the music industry I’ve observed drug abuse in people I’ve called friends. Many are now dead. Lives wasted to the use of narcotics like heroin and addictive and destructive drugs like cocaine as well as “speed”. My drug of choice was alcohol, it came close, far too close, to destroying me, though I was never tempted to experiment in the other addictive substances and I have never smoked “pot” either. I’ve watched its effects destroy fine minds. Quite apart from all that, I’ve simply never been interested in sampling for myself the effects I observed in others. A great many transvestites harbour guilt about the practise and create fantasies for themselves where they are forced to “become female” against their will and much transvestite erotic literature involves bondage or episodes of discipline often by cruel or dominant women who force feminization upon them. It is a well documented fact that the effect of pornography wanes as people become used to it and will at some time begin to seek ever more extreme scenarios of their favourite themes. Transvestism acts in exactly the same way but instead of being a harmless pastime enjoyed in the privacy of their home or at clubs and venues where it is accepted, it becomes an ever greater part of the person’s life until eventually much like narcotics it becomes the force that drives their life. I have actually listened to people I’ve counselled confess to fantasies of becoming forced into living lives as women; lives where they cannot escape back into their old male lives even though they may wish to do so. In many cases I have since heard they now live as females and have undergone surgery. These narratives are quite different to the ones where there is a definite knowledge that their core sex identity is female (or male). Many clinicians dismiss differences such as this as variations or a late awakening. I do not; I see it as THE clear difference. It’s hard to pinpoint where the source of the addiction lays. Whether it is the feel of clothing designed for females and the sexual excitement it creates in them or even the notoriety of being transsexual and the shocked reaction of people when their “secret” is revealed. Even if the “secret” was plain as day! It may be any one of these things or even all of them. Given the behaviour I have observed over the years my money is on addiction to the shock value with an each way bet on claiming transsexual as a release from the guilt or perceived shame of transvestism. That, however, is a cynical thought on my part and perhaps not professional. The reality is that the addiction is most likely to be one of sexual gratification. By making that claim it is not my intention to denigrate or to call the sufferers mean names. I do however believe this is a valid point that needs to be researched and is imperative it is done devoid of politically correct thinking and reported without the restraint of politically correct terminology. There has been some speculation that certain pleasure chemicals are released during the periods of cross dressing and sexual activity and it is these chemicals that are the source of the addiction. The act of cross-dressing and subsequent sexual pleasure becomes associated with the release of these chemicals in the brain and it is the association which creates ever stronger desire. Misdirected sexual targeting may mean that there is an illusion of a genuine liaison with a female in the act of cross-dressing. Is this the reason so many seek to retain a relationship with wives or even seek out a relationship with a female who can accept the cross-dressing in a kind of “Lesbian” relationship.There are those who retain enough homophobia to claim lesbianism and find female partners This is by no means the same thing as Classic Transsexuals who happen to be genuinely lesbian. Now, just for the record and before everyone jumps on me, human love, ALL human love and how it expresses itself and with whom, is fine with me. I know of quite a few genuine lesbian relationships, I am not referring to this type of scenario. However, not all situations are genuine. Again where is the research on this possibility?What has to stop is the deliberate and sustained campaign begun by Virginia Prince and doggedly continued by militant campaigners to alleviate lingering guilt or shame by clinging to a legitimate birth condition that is Transsexuality. Becoming angry, behaving badly, calling others names and creating hierarchies where there are simply differences is not helpful. It isn’t ladylike, either, but then, when Emily Pankhurst chained herself to railings it wasn’t considered “ladylike” either! However at some point in time it is inevitable that the two conditions will exist as separate entities with the differences clarified and clarified with scientific evidence to support it. Much of the evidence already exists but is discredited or dismissed because some find it uncomfortable or unpalatable. I am not seeking to trivialise the very real distress and the often disruptive and even life threatening nature of the extreme form of transvestism that is transgender. I’ve witnessed far too many instances of what havoc the condition can wreak on someone who experiences its ravages. It is genuine but the cause at the core is different to that which causes transsexuality even though laymen and even presumed experts seem either unable to separate the conditions or are determined to conflate the two conditions. Perhaps when the new DSM is finally agreed upon and released there will be a consensus within the medical fraternity. Will there be peace among the blogs? There it is much like the middle-east; too many people harbouring grudges who have long memories and little or no compassion. As a footnote, Harry Benjamin also noted the addictive nature of transvestism and it is duly noted in his book, The Transsexual Phenomenon [cf. Note]. This work published in 1965 remains remains the most accurate and complete analysis on Transsexuals and the distinctions between that and Transvestism. Neither did he believe that the former leads to progression to the other. He did however, note transvestism's addictive nature. NoteHarry S. Benjamin, M.D. (12 Jan 1885 — 24 Aug 1986) was a German-born sexologist, best known for pioneering work on the identification and treatment of transsexualism.
The Transsexual Phenomenon. Harry Benjamin. Warner Books (1966; reissue, April 1977). ISBN-10: 0446824267; ISBN-13: 978-0446824262.
|
|||
| Last Updated on Wednesday, 22 December 2010 21:15 |
Add comment
TS-Si often publishes material that presents challenges and insights worthy of extended discussion. We encourage lively, open debate and ask that you show respect for others with responsible comments. This can be done with emotional maturity and intelligence. Before commenting, please thoroughly read the article and other comments, then stay on topic. Address the issues without presumptions about the author(s) or other persons.
We will remove any comment that is a personal attack or off-topic, abusive, exceptionally incoherent, libelous, mysogonist, obscene, phobic, profane, racist, or otherwise inappropriate. Removal for cause may occur without prior notice and repeat offenders may lose commenting privileges. These abuses and/or any attempt to post a solicitations and/or advertising, flood, spam, or otherwise disrupt TS-Si.org operations are subject to further sanctions.
All comments are subject to our terms of use and overall site policies, available under the About menu tab.
We will remove any comment that is a personal attack or off-topic, abusive, exceptionally incoherent, libelous, mysogonist, obscene, phobic, profane, racist, or otherwise inappropriate. Removal for cause may occur without prior notice and repeat offenders may lose commenting privileges. These abuses and/or any attempt to post a solicitations and/or advertising, flood, spam, or otherwise disrupt TS-Si.org operations are subject to further sanctions.
All comments are subject to our terms of use and overall site policies, available under the About menu tab.



Somewhere, Planet Earth. Transvestism or cross dressing, are the same thing and quite simply are acts performed for sexual gratification. Like pretty much all similar acts it has variations on its theme. It also contains depths of “need” particularly in its initial stages.
brain
Again where is the research on this possibility?
The TS-Si News Service is a collaborative effort by TS-Si.org editors, contributors, and corresponding institutions. Sources can include the cited individuals and organizations, as well as TS-Si.org staff contributions. Articles and news reports do not necessarily convey official positions of TS-Si, its partners, or affiliates. We welcome your comments. Use the form below to leave a public comment or send private correspondence via the TS-Si Contact Page. We will not divulge any personal details or place you on a mailing list without your permission.
The TS-Si News Service
and the TS-Si Research Service are collaborations of TS-Si officials, staff, contributors, and corresponding institutions. The contents do not necessarily convey official positions of TS-Si or its owners, participants, partners, or affiliates.
Comments
You didn't name it as such, but it can, and has been used to slam and denigrate transsexual women who managed to stay in denial longer than most.
The concept of autogynophilia is valid if one dials back the criteria to fit the facts.
Quote:I agree. Its why I never bag Anne Lawrence. She was prepared to be honest and was treated to the same B/S CT's are dished up for rejecting TG'ism, pretty much for the same reasons - challenging the dogma!
There is a strong argument that can be made that the generations born between 1940 and 1970 may have experienced ignorance of their condition and therefore caused delayed transition. Later generations there is little excuse since medical treatment and knowledge of the condition albeit skewed was widely available. Acceptance levels in most societies is relatively high today so there is little excuse to delay within current younger generations due to ignorance. Yet we still see high levels of delayed transition. There was a discussion with a transvestite forum recently discussing and admitting the addictive nature of transvestism. It's long past time this issue was taken into account in the diagnostic process instead of pandering to an individuals fantasies.
The scientific evidence available points in the opposite direction and there is far more biological commonality between CDs, TVs, & TS. You really need to read up on the latest neurobiology and embryology before you make comments like this.
Also, AGP is nothing more than a spurious correlation. The only difference between a late transitioner and an early one is that one was born straight and the other gay. Those who are straight try to succeed in life as woman-loving-ma les and thereby get themselves entangled in all kinds of external factors (wives, kids, and on and on and on) which prevent them from fully realizing their cross-gender expression. They also repress the desires as adolescents -- again to succeed as straight males -- and it is well known the "exotic becomes erotic". This is how the desire for cross gender expression becomes sexualized.
In contrast, the born gay transitioner does not have to contend with being a successful as a woman-loving male and therefore do not accrue all the baggage I described above. So with the born gay transitioner, cross-gender expression itself gets pushed to the fore early in life and they transition early.
So in sum, there is a biological basis for nearly all cases of cross-gender expression and the seeming differences between the types has more to do with the sexual orientation of the individual than anything else...and BTW, sexual orientation is biological too and controlled by the same structures in the brain and the desire for cross-gender expression. Again READ THE SCIENCE!!!
I have no dog in this fight, but I would find it far more helpful and persuasive if citations were provided in support of categorical scientific assertions rather than general directions to learn as much as the commentator.
I have an open mind of the questions raised, and would be interested in being directed to the studies (I am being told to read) showing the asserted biological similarities between cross dressers, transvestites, and persons of transsexual history. I would also be interested in citations to studies supporting the asserted causal relationship between sexual orientation and time of transitioning.
CD's are MALE as are TV's; the Gay/straight claim is more bogus nonsense. As far as I know no Gay Male has any desire to transition early or late.
Overall, I'd rate Christine's claims as a very pure grade of Bovine fertilizer.
Blanchard was wrong about AG/AP. Those are types of TGs, not true-TSs, and yes, TG men pretending to be women often get surgery to further their fantasy and lies. True-TSs never transition for any sexual reasons. AGs are straight men who lie and pretend to be women, even possibly mutilating themselves to lend credence to their lies. APs are gay men who lie and pretend to be women to avoid the social consequences of being gay. True-TSs never transition for such motives and are just as valid as women (or men in case of FtMs) regardless of when they transition or what their final orientation is.
The medical evidence is still thin compared to what could have been achieved since Benjamin. In part this is a direct consequence of the vocal misdirection provided by Blanchard in his 1989 paper and his, Baileys, Zucker's and Lawrence's rise in the ranks of the APA and finally their appointment to the Committee for DSM5 re-framing. The failure of hypothesis lies in the marginal sample size and research bias as disclosed by the framing of his inventories. He draws generalized conclusions without fundamentally creating an analysis of the root of the condition he is investigating. His entire research lacks a differentiation between the transvestic phenomenon and the transsexual phenomenon.
The proposed revisions to DSM5 again or still treat the transsexual condition as gender dysphoria, that is as primarily a mental condition. No attempts are made to classify secondary distress as such. Moreover, post transition does include the ability to be considered as such without the need for surgery or a material justification why surgery cannot be undertaken.
The commentary on "post-transitio n" makes it clear that there is no actual exit clause, that is because of the need of continued hormone intake following surgery it is considered at best "in remission" with no ultimate exit from this transitionary stage.
This is perhaps why he was able to prescribe hormones like oestrogen to physically at least male patients at a time when issues like this one were considered grounds to consign a patient to a mental institution. I’ve read “The Transsexual Phenomenon” a couple of times and I’m searching my brain to find the part where Benjamin says he’s erroneously diagnosed patients as transvestite and later diagnosed transsexual. (I’d be very grateful if you could direct me to that passage) What Benjamin does say is that with the relatively small number of patients he treated (152 up until 1965 when the book was first published) He found it difficult to draw clear distinctions between his types I through to V If you recall his basis for groupings was “intensity” and his respect for Kinsey convinced him to use Kinsey style groupings. He does however hint at dissatisfaction with this choice since at a number of points in his book he urges greater research. Where Benjamin draws clear lines because he notes there is a clear and distinct difference is between groups V and VI That difference is “psychosexual Inversion” It is a rather unfortunate fact of medical history that this phenomenon or theory was first applied to homosexuality and later dropped or discounted. Benjamin did however believe its factual existence in type VI transsexuals.
That said my main point to you is that the patients he may have grouped as type III transvestites and falling on it’s borders he may have later accepted their intensity as laying within type IV grouping hem among low intensity transsexuals.
Now regarding the point you made regards DSM V the exit clause for transsexuals lays with the rationale and the rationale makes it abundantly clear that any designation of “cure” requires SRS otherwise the conflict betwixt sex and gender is clearly unresolved. The need for HRT is simply irrelevant especially since a great many other patients require artificial intake of hormones for a myriad of reasons.
I hope this helps Kathryn
The following passage triggered my comment above on DSM: "Cross-sex hormone treatment of gonadectomized individuals could, of course, be coded as treatment of hypogonadism, but this would not apply to individuals who have not undergone gonadectomy but receive hormone treatments. In the text, we will, however, also mention that the traditional course specifier of “full remission” does apply to many children with the diagnosis of Gender Dysphoria and, perhaps, for a small number of adolescents and adults."
I agree with you that this does not apply to non op gender variant people. but I fear that the reality for transsexuals still pulls them back into the "gender world" by virtue of a mental disorder classification. We have no place in the DSM except in regards to secondary consequential disorders such as depression and behavioral disorders secondary to the primary physical disorder.
In any event I thank you for your essay.
Kathryn
became 12 years old. I am about to complete my 58 years and I am still taking pleasure of transvestism.
Of course u get addicted to this kind of activity but it is the case with many habits like social
net working .Should we call facebook addiction as narcotic drug? I am an Indian and carried this
activity only when I got opportunity at home . Had this habit been like a narcotic drug I would have
plundered people ,got money ,hire a room in hotel and enjoy saree wearing every day ! I never did it.
I want to throw light on some aspects of " my " kind of transvestism. I am a perfect male , thoroughly
sexually satisfied my woman ( yes there was only one woman in my life. my wife).No lady ever loved me
including my wife).sexually there was only one woman in my life. ok?
My attraction was towards bras and not panties. Why because bra , saree ,long hair, cosmetics are
the factors in femininity in Indian surroundings. So your point of pleasures are also dependent on the
surroundings. Men in western countries may enjoy frocks and lingeries.Mirro r is an important partner
in this play and to some extent dance also. Fortunately I am fair coloured and there are no hairs on
body except the thighs. So looking like a beautiful lady is not difficult for me.In fact I have not seen
beautiful female (?) like me on the net.( of course from transvestite male category ).I have designed bras,
blouses for me .Stitched them myself. The all acts give immense pleasure ,some time more intense than
that is in a [deleted] with woman.Remember it is just a kick of sexual pleasure and should be differentiated
from trans genders.
I believe this would work better with a rim shot.
RSS feed for comments to this post