RSS Feed: TS-Si News Service. RSS Feed: TS-Si Research Service. TS-Si Reader Comments. Delicious: TS-Si News Service. Digg: TS-Si News Service.
Pinterest.
StumbleUpon. Facebook: TS-Si News Service.
GooglePlus: TS-Si News Service.
Twitter: Follow TS-Si News Service.

TS-Si is dedicated to the acceptance, medical treatment, and legal protection of individuals correcting the misalignment of their brains and their anatomical sex, while supporting their transition into society as hormonally reconstituted and surgically corrected citizens.
TS-Si supports open access to publicly funded research.

Leave a comment.
Exploring Regulatory Function with Comparative Epigenomics Print E-mail
SciMed - Genetics & Genome
TS-Si News Service   
Tuesday, 12 June 2012 12:00
Comparative Epigenome Browser (Detail).St. Louis, MO, USA. A method called comparative epigenomics uses interspecies comparison of DNA and histone modifications for in-depth annotation of the regulatory genome.

So far, sequencing of the human genome has provided a wealth of genetic information, but the goal of cataloguing the specific functions of every gene (and the collective interactions of all genes) has remained elusive.


While the genome of an organism contains all its genes, it is the epigenome that decides which are expressed (or turned on). Though genomic science has long focused on comparative genomics — comparing the genomes of similar species and finding the commonalities to determine how common traits are regulated — comparative epigenetics is intended as a more in-depth look at regulatory functions.

Comparative Epigenomics :: The research team concluded that, with proper analysis procedures, traces of interspecies epigenomic conservation could be identified. They then demonstrated that the conserved epigenetic markers can be effectively used to annotate the genome, clarifying the genome's regulatory function. Image courtesy of the Institute for Genomic Biology and Department of Bioengineering at the University of Illinois.
Click Pic for Details
The researchers were led by Sheng Zhong, of the Institute for Genomic Biology and Department of Bioengineering at the University of Illinois. Zhong collaborated with Ting Wang at Washington University in St. Louis, Harris Lewin, and Franklin West at the University of Georgia. They focused their work on three species: humans, mice, and pigs.

By analyzing 9 epigenomic marks in pluripotent stem cells, they were able to create an epigenomic map for each which they could then compare. The findings appear in the journal Cell.

The research team concluded that, with proper analysis procedures, traces of interspecies epigenomic conservation could be identified. They then demonstrated that the conserved epigenetic markers can be effectively used to annotate the genome, clarifying the genome's regulatory function.

Understanding the genome is one of the most pressing problems for science, and the investigators believe their study findings shed light on a promising alternative method. "Comparative epigenomics enables us to find more clues from evolution about the functions of our genomes," adds Zhong.

CitationComparative Epigenomic Annotation of Regulatory DNA. Shu Xiao, Dan Xie, Xiaoyi Cao, Pengfei Yu, Xiaoyun Xing, Chieh-Chun Chen, Meagan Musselman, Mingchao Xie, Franklin D. West, Harris A. Lewin, Ting Wang, Sheng Zhong. Cell 2012; 149(6): 1381-1392. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.029

Highlights

●  Epigenetic patterns of histone and DNA modification are conserved across species
●  Epigenomic conservation occurs in both fast- and slow-evolving DNA sequences
●  Changes in the epigenome, transcriptome, and protein-DNA binding patterns are correlated
●  The conserved colocalization of different epigenetic marks defines regulatory DNA

Abstract

Despite the explosive growth of genomic data, functional annotation of regulatory sequences remains difficult. Here, we introduce “comparative epigenomics” — interspecies comparison of DNA and histone modifications — as an approach for annotation of the regulatory genome. We measured in human, mouse, and pig pluripotent stem cells the genomic distributions of cytosine methylation, H2A.Z, H3K4me1/2/3, H3K9me3, H3K27me3, H3K27ac, H3K36me3, transcribed RNAs, and P300, TAF1, OCT4, and NANOG binding. We observed that epigenomic conservation was strong in both rapidly evolving and slowly evolving DNA sequences, but not in neutrally evolving sequences. In contrast, evolutionary changes of the epigenome and the transcriptome exhibited a linear correlation. We suggest that the conserved colocalization of different epigenomic marks can be used to discover regulatory sequences. Indeed, seven pairs of epigenomic marks identified exhibited regulatory functions during differentiation of embryonic stem cells into mesendoderm cells. Thus, comparative epigenomics reveals regulatory features of the genome that cannot be discerned from sequence comparisons alone.

TS-Si News Service.The TS-Si News Service is a collaborative effort by TS-Si.org editors, contributors, and corresponding institutions. Sources can include the cited individuals and organizations, as well as TS-Si.org staff contributions. Articles and news reports do not necessarily convey official positions of TS-Si, its partners, or affiliates. We welcome your comments. Use the form below to leave a public comment or send private correspondence via the TS-Si Contact Page. We will not divulge any personal details or place you on a mailing list without your permission.


TS-Si is dedicated to the acceptance, medical treatment, and legal protection of individuals correcting the misalignment of their brains and their anatomical sex, while supporting their transition into society as hormonally reconstituted and surgically corrected citizens.


Last Updated on Tuesday, 12 June 2012 12:07
 

Add comment

TS-Si often publishes material that presents challenges and insights worthy of extended discussion. We encourage lively, open debate and ask that you show respect for others with responsible comments. This can be done with emotional maturity and intelligence. Before commenting, please thoroughly read the article and other comments, then stay on topic. Address the issues without presumptions about the author(s) or other persons.

We will remove any comment that is a personal attack or off-topic, abusive, exceptionally incoherent, libelous, mysogonist, obscene, phobic, profane, racist, or otherwise inappropriate. Removal for cause may occur without prior notice and repeat offenders may lose commenting privileges. These abuses and/or any attempt to post a solicitations and/or advertising, flood, spam, or otherwise disrupt TS-Si.org operations are subject to further sanctions.

All comments are subject to our terms of use and overall site policies, available under the About menu tab.


Security code
Refresh