Off Tangent Comix
See our Annotated List of DSM-related news, research reports, analyses, and opinion pieces.
Visit the TS-Si Article Archive for reports on science, medicine, government, society, and other topics.
DNA Blueprints Guide The Construction Of Specific Human Structures
Chad Mirkin discusses using DNA to build a three-dimensional structure out of gold, likening the process to building a house. Starting with basic materials such as bricks, wood, siding, stone and shingles, a construction team can build many different types of houses out of the same building blocks.
The article includes an audio recording of the full interview. Photo courtesy of the UCSD School of Medicine.
| Change: Bring Good Governance to the Nation |
 |
 |
| Opinion - Editorials | |||
| TS-Si | |||
| Saturday, 06 September 2008 16:30 | |||
 Washington, DC, USA. The US election for president and congress is on, with a hard sprint toward the November finish line. Everything is under tight control, with campaign appearances scheduled for friendly audiences at a considerable distance from the general population. We can expect a flashy — but largely superficial — discussion of the issues.
Somewhere in the frenzied activity that is the American political season lay all sorts of US political and cultural factions working on getting what they want out of the parties and their candidates. We have a short and nonpolitical list of our own preferred measures, repeated numerous times here at TS-Si.org; we will discuss them further at a later date.
In the meantime, we discuss the high ground of good governance, fundamental to a healthy democracy and the basis for free, fair, and informed decision making.
Good Governance
By our reckoning, there are at least three fundamental reforms that are a necessary preconditon for rational decision making. Each item below addresses an issue that is currently mired in the political gameplay, but in our view must be a focus of reform.
Each of our proposals can be considered a component of good governance. Without them, we sincerely doubt the possibility of an enlightened debate on our different approaches to policies and programs.
Promote Voting As A Civic Duty. Drives to get out the vote have become a partisan tactical ploy on Election Day. Each of the major political parties work to mobilize voters favorable to them and suppress the vote of their political competitors.
The United States of America entered the world with with truly advanced notions of suffrage and the supreme importance of enabling the expression of popular will. The limited voting rights at the time of the American Revolution have been expanded — at great cost — to include black men and all women. We as a nation expend significant sums to enable voting and our constitutional guarantees of democratic representation.
This is so important to us that untold numbers of Americans have died to secure and protect our rights. And yet, we now have political parties that muffle our collective progress at every turn in myopic attempts to serve their own limited goals at the expense of our nation's health and long-term prospects.
Fixing this situation requires both political change and cultural evolution. We have passed legislation that aims to limit the direct political influence of contributions to a political party or candidate. Often, that same money is then rerouted to influence citizens to the same ends.
A good start on reform would be to declare the illegality of gifts and services by political parties to influence the behavior of able citizens doing their duty under the Constitution.
That means: no free rides, no free lunch, and no walking around money.
End Gerrymandering. And if we have a fair vote, what then? Congressional and legislative districts are drawn following the US census. Except for just a handful of states, the party that controls a state legislature tries to maximize its advantage in the state delegation to Congress.
Politicians advance many rationalizations for their manipulation of electoral district or constituency boundaries, but the common theme — ironically enough — is a condescending commitment to fairness. Gerrymandering techniques exist to help or hinder constituents that are either favored or feared. At various times, the practice can target members of particular groups: linguistic, political, racial, religious and many others.
Please note what all these groups have in common: the groups targeted by Gerrymandering are us, the people. We are manipulating into accepting elected representatives who are not the products of a fair election and then allow them to target us for neutralization because our views do not match their preferences.
Within pre-existing constitutional constraints, the US Supreme Court acted to ensure proportional representation in our lower legislative houses. However, they have limited ability to constrain the reapportionment process and the specifics of setting legislative boundaries. Congress must act.
We can make a start on ending the Gerrymander by filing a protest with our local election authorities that notes our positioning in the wrong districts. We can appear at the candidate forums for districts that should be ours and clearly identify the rationale for our appearances when we speak. We can ask the candidates how they plan to do their duty under the Constitution.
That means: reshaping the State Secretaries of State into non-partisan offices, non-partisan apportionment, and transparency (open meetings on election planning and results).
Keep Honest Books. Our elected representatives have become quite skilled at using accounting rules to misassign expenditures or ignore their existence altogether. Line items with available cash are used to hide over-spending in other accounts.
This is why the transportation fund is crippled, the national parks are short of money, and social security is compromised. The money is there but used as a guarantee for other unrelated purposes. And, in some cases, money is spent but not counted as part of the budget. How many people remember the Savings and Loan bailout? In budgetary and accounting terms, it never happened.
Here in Washington, DC, many agencies get by on what are called supplementals to disguise the fact that there never was enough money allocated in the first place. In fact, hardly any of the agencies really know how much money they had, have now, or will have to meet their previously legislated responsibilities.
Cleaning up the budget mess can only happen with an assertive attempt to uncover what really goes in in the treasury. By that, we emphatically do not mean playing cynical politics by exposing some particular action for partisan purposes. Rather, we recommend a non-partisan attempt to try and figure what actually goes on for later use as a baseline for decision making.
That means a dispassionate analysis of legislative actions and government operations, accounting of all authorizations and expenditures, and publication of every representative's vote on every line item (whether on of off the books).
Getting from Here To There
But how can we get Congress and the legislatures to take partisan politics out of voting, reapportionment, and accounting for the public purse? The the members of those bodies are the main beneficiaries of a corrupted — and unfair — process. After all, we are asking the same people who got us into trouble to get us out of trouble.
When reform depends on authorities who are too reluctant, compromised, or ignorant to act, it becomes even more important to expose their actions to the public. Here are a few things we can do:
Run for office, any office. The larger society consists of people who stand for election to advisory commissions of all sorts, their homeowner's association, the PTA, and political offices. Why not us? We are part of a community larger than any preoccupation with transition and sex or gender issues.
Here at TS-Si, we have participants and contributors who have been involved in electoral efforts at a variety of levels. Some of them have transitioned on the job while continuing to serve their communities. We have seen the same tendency across the country. We have made a beginning; we need more to step up.
Make good governance part of your platform. Candidates can and should have different positions on the issues of the day, whether foreign or domestic. The point here is that good governance is non-political and non-partisan. Please note: bi-partisanship has nothing to do with this. Collaboration between the political parties is part of the problem. Challenge your opponent to join with you in a pledge to take politics out of what should be civic duty.
Toss in as many hats as possible. There is no good reason why only one reform-minded candidate can run for one office at a time. After all, two people of very different political viewpoints can both advance good governance. The point is to take partisanship out of the equation.
Don't be afraid to lose. The desire to obtain privilege and keep it is too much a part of our political campaigns. How many times have you heard a candidate wink, nod, and say they must be elected first before making necessary changes? What became of that? So what if we lose? Point made. And do it again and again until someone notices that a lot of people are losing on principle all over the country.
It is only natural for the non-engaged public to eventually notice and ask the key question: how can we help?
Don't hold back on your participation. This is a message with special resonance for those entering or through transition. Whether pre-op or post-op, if you can tolerate disclosure (and entrenched interests will out you if they can), step up and participate.
Remember the bottom line. Promoting good governance is the right thing, but consider this: it is also the practical thing. Take the high ground and let the public see us not as disorderly protesters but as part of an aroused citizenry with the public interest at heart.
 TS-Si.org Editorials convey the official positions of our organization, TS-Si. They do not necessarily reflect the opinion of TS-Si authors, partners, or affiliates. Signed articles by our contributing authors or referenced news sources do not constitute official policy.
Â
We welcome your comments. You can use the public form below or send private correspondence via the TS-Si Contact Page. We will not divulge any personal details or place you on a mailing list without your permission.
Set as favorite
Bookmark
Email This
Comments (3)
 Write comment
|
|||
| Last Updated on Tuesday, 16 December 2008 19:33 |
Subscribe to this comment's feed
Show/Hide comments
Show/Hide comment form
The TS-Si News Service is a collaboration of TS-Si staff, contributors, and corresponding institutions. Contents do not necessarily convey official positions of TS-Si, its partners, or affiliates.We welcome responsible comments. Use the public article forms throughout this site or send private correspondence via the TS-Si Contact Page. We will not divulge personal details or place you on a mailing list without your permission.
Except where noted, all works on this site are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License. Copyright © 2005-2009 TS-Si, Inc. Some rights reserved.