is dedicated to the acceptance, medical treatment, and legal protection of individuals correcting the misalignment of their brains and their anatomical sex, while supporting their transition into society.
US Independence Day

Independence Day
 
Leave a comment.
 
See continuing updates on the APA, DSM, and the upcoming DSM Fifth Edition (DSM-V).
 
See our Annotated List of DSM-related news, research reports, analyses, and opinion pieces.
 
Visit the TS-Si Article Archive for reports on science, medicine, government, society, and other topics.

Join The Flow!

Email

Add to Google

Follow us on Twitter

Bookmark and Share
Leave a comment.
Despite Genetic Evidence For Mental Illness, Americans Show Little Tolerance Print E-mail
SciMed - Soc & Psych
TS-Si News Service   
Saturday, 30 August 2008 16:30
Schizophrenia
TS-Si Soc & Psych
Los Angeles, CA, USA. Research shows that chronic grief activates pleasure areas of the brain, findings that could change how health professionals treat the disorder. Grief is universal, and most of us will probably experie...

Evanston, IL, USA. Whether they be high-flying politicians or ordininary citizens of good reputation, there can be a fall from grace. Sometimes moral actions lead to bad, making no sense at all. A study observes that extreme...

Nashville, TN, USA. New research indicates the way our brain handles how we move through space — including being able to imagine literally walking in someone else's shoes — may be related to how and why we experience empa...

Fairbanks, AK, USA. Both boys and girls have issues, but Judith Kleinfeld says boys are the ones who get the raw deal. Her review of issues characterizing American boyhood, how they compare to those affecting girls, and the...

Montréal, Québec, Canada. A team of psychologists has found that the light given off by the eyebrow and mouth region (luminescence) is vital in rapid gender discrimination. The term "gender", our outward facing pr...
Philadelphia, PA, USA. A new study shows that, while more Americans believe in the genetic causes of mental illness, the USA is no more tolerant of the mentally ill than 10 years ago. The study uses a 2006 replication of the 1996 General Social Survey Mental Health Module to explore trends in public beliefs about mental illness, focusing in particular on public support for genetic arguments.
 
Prior medical-sociology studies reveal that public beliefs about mental illness reflect the dominant mental-illness treatment, the changing nature of media portrayals of the mentally ill, and the prevailing wisdom of science and medicine. The new article, by sociology professor Jason Schnittker at the University of Pennsylvania addresses why tolerance of the mentally ill hasn’t increased along with the rising popularity of a biomedical view of its causes.
 

An uncertain revolution: Why the rise of a genetic model of mental illness has not increased tolerance. Jason Schnittker. Social Science and Medicine 2008 Aug 12. PubMed ID 18703264

 
According to Schnittker’s research, genetic arguments have, in fact, increased public support for medical treatment but at the same time aren’t clearly associated with improvements in overall tolerance levels. The study explores tolerance in terms of social distancing:
  • unwillingness to live next door to a mentally ill person,
     
  • have a group home for the mentally ill in the neighborhood,
     
  • spend an evening socializing with a mentally ill person,
     
  • work closely with such a person on the job,
     
  • make friends with someone with a mental illness, or
     
  • have a mentally ill person marry into the family.
Schnittker's study finds that different genetic arguments have, in fact, become more popular but have very different associations depending on the mental illness being considered. His findings appear in the journal Social Science and Medicine.
 
“In the case of schizophrenia, genetic arguments are associated with fears regarding violence,” Schnittker said. “In fact, attributing schizophrenia to genes is no different from attributing it to bad character — either way Americans see those with schizophrenia as ‘damaged’ in some essential way and, therefore, likely to be violent.
 
However, when applied to depression, genetic arguments have very different connotations: they are associated with social acceptance. If you imagine that someone’s depression is a genetic problem, the condition seems more real and less blameworthy: it’s in their genes, they’re not weak, so I should accept them for who they are.”
 
Schnittker’s study also shows that genetic arguments are associated with recommending medical treatment but are not associated with the perceived likelihood of improvement.
 
“While the stigma surrounding mental illness has not diminished, the rate of treatment for psychiatric disorders has increased,” Schnittker wrote. “The culture surrounding mental illness has become more treatment-focused with direct-to-consumer advertising of psychiatric medications now a mainstay of popular media.”
 


An uncertain revolution: Why the rise of a genetic model of mental illness has not increased tolerance. Jason Schnittker. Social Science and Medicine 2008 Aug 12. PubMed ID 18703264

Abstract

This study uses the 2006 replication of the 1996 General Social Survey Mental Health Module to explore trends in public beliefs about mental illness in the USA. Drawing on three models related to the framing of genetic arguments in popular media, the study attempts to address why tolerance of the mentally ill has not increased, despite the growing popularity of a biomedical view. The key to resolving this paradox lies in understanding how genetic arguments interact with other beliefs about mental illness, as well as the complex ideational implications of genetic frameworks. Genetic arguments have contingent relationships with tolerance. When applied to schizophrenia, genetic arguments are positively associated with fears regarding violence. Indeed, in this regard, attributing schizophrenia to genes is no different from attributing schizophrenia to bad character. However, when applied to depression, genetic arguments are positively associated with social acceptance. In addition to these contingencies, genetic explanations have discontinuous relationships with beliefs regarding treatment. Although genetic arguments are positively associated with recommending medical treatment, they are not associated with the perceived likelihood of improvement. The net result of these assorted relationships is little change in overall levels of tolerance over time. Because of the blunt nature of the forces propelling a biomedical view-including the growing popularity of psychiatric medications-altering beliefs about the etiology of mental illness is unlikely, on its own, to increase tolerance.

 
TS-Si News ServiceThe TS-Si News Service is a collaborative effort by TS-Si.org editors, contributors, and corresponding institutions. The sources can include the cited individuals and organizations, as well as TS-Si.org staff contributions. Articles and news reports do not necessarily convey official positions of TS-Si, its partners, or affiliates. We welcome your comments. Use the form below to leave a public comment or send private correspondence via the TS-Si Contact Page. We will not divulge any personal details or place you on a mailing list without your permission.

 

Digg! Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Free and Open Source Software News Google! Live! Facebook! Slashdot! Technorati! StumbleUpon! MySpace! Spurl! Simpy! Newsvine! Blinklist! Furl! Fark! Blogmarks! Yahoo! Netvouz! Free Joomla PHP extensions, software, information and tutorials.

Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites.

Comments (2)Add Comment

Write comment

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy
Last Updated on Saturday, 30 August 2008 16:22