| Symmetry Predicts Sex-typical Body Attractiveness |
|
|
| Medicine - Soc & Psych | |||
| Written by TS-Si News Service | |||
| Wednesday, 20 August 2008 16:30 | |||
![]()
Uxbridge, Middlesex, UK. Scientists used a breakthrough methodology that reinforces sexual dimorphism with objective measures of what makes the human body attractive. The first 3D study identifies masculine traits associated with the attractiveness and symmetry of male and female bodies, explaining why symmetry predicts bodily attractiveness.
Brunel University scientists have developed an explanation for the correlation between attractiveness and bodily characteristics like height, broad shoulders, long legs, breast size, or a curvy figure.
Fluctuating asymmetry and preferences for sex-typical bodily characteristics. William M. Brown, Michael E. Price, Jinsheng Kang, Nicholas Pound, Yue Zhao, and Hui Yu. PNAS 18 August 2008. doi: 10.1073 / pnas.0710420105.
The study also explored the degree of asymmetries between the left and right sides of the body. It is widely believed that for many species, including humans, asymmetry is an indirect measure of developmental quality. The findings appear in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS).
Dr. William Brown and colleagues at the Brunel School of Social Sciences and School of Engineering and Design used a 3D optical body scanner to accurately measure human body proportions. [Note] Through their research at the Brunel Centre for Cognition and Neuroimaging (CCNI), Brown and his team identified a property dubbed ‘body masculinity’.
The property is a mathematical fusion of several traits, including greater height, wider shoulders, smaller breasts and shorter legs.
The study co-author, Dr. Jinsheng Kang from Brunel’s School of Engineering and Design, explained the methodological benefits of this new technology:
Previous studies of this kind relied on callipers to measure body traits, which are highly prone to human error and can only measure up to a maximum of nine inches, thus missing important 3D aspects of size and shape.
Key findings of the study included:
Commenting on the research, Dr. Brown says “It is widely believed that human beings are attracted to one another as a result of genotypic and phenotypic quality — in other words, their prospect as a mate who will yield higher quality offspring for the chooser.”
“My previous research suggested that bodily symmetry is not necessarily what people attend to when they find someone attractive but nonetheless the physical cues that they do prefer may reveal an individual’s underlying developmental quality (i.e. degree of symmetry)." "This new research identifies an explanation for the correlation between bodily shape and attractiveness:
In many species fewer departures from perfect symmetry are associated with good development, health and reproductive success.”
He concludes: “It seems that because bodily asymmetries are too subtle to be seen with the naked eye, evolution has instead engineered more conspicuous signals and displays, such as broad shoulders, curvy waist lines or smooth dance moves to indicate mate quality.”
Set as favorite
Bookmark
Email This
Comments (0)
![]() Write comment
|
|||
| Last Updated on Wednesday, 20 August 2008 16:45 |






Dr. William Brown and colleagues at the
“My previous research suggested that bodily symmetry is not necessarily what people attend to when they find someone attractive but nonetheless the physical cues that they do prefer may reveal an individual’s underlying developmental quality (i.e. degree of symmetry)."
The TS-Si News Service is a collaborative effort by TS-Si.org editors, contributors, and corresponding institutions. The sources can include the cited individuals and organizations, as well as TS-Si.org staff contributions. Articles and news reports do not necessarily convey official positions of TS-Si, its partners, or affiliates. We welcome your comments. Use the form below to leave a public comment or send private correspondence via the 
The TS-Si News Service is a collaboration of TS-Si staff, contributors, and corresponding institutions. Contents do not necessarily convey official positions of TS-Si, its partners, or affiliates