| DSM-5 Update: Annotated List of TS-Si.org Articles |
|
|
| Resources - DSM | |
| Sharon Gaughan | |
| Wednesday, 10 February 2010 08:00 | |
|
Fairfax, VA, USA. The Manual for Diagnosis of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) is the principal desktop diagnostic reference for psychiatric diagnosis. Used by physicians and other caregivers in the United States and around the world, the American Psychiatric Association (APA) published the current edition, DSM-IV, in 1994. While influential, there is considerable variation in its acceptance and practical application. The APA named the Work Groups and membership for the next DSM-5 revision, scheduled an early draft for comment (pub. 2010), and plans on completion of the final version in May 2013. The APA stresses there will be a greater emphasis on evidence-based medicine. The APA announcement stimulated wide interest in the professional, patient, and activist communities. TS-Si.org expanded its coverage of this important development with a variety of articles that touch on the DSM-V deliberations. Reactions and suggestions from our readers are always welcome. You can see current comments from our readers in the TS-Si.org Comments Section. This article carries the date of its most recent revision. TS-Si ResourcesTS-Si.org features an extensive collection of research abstracts, technical articles and opinion pieces on the DSM. All TS-Si content is searchable.
|
|
| Last Updated on Wednesday, 10 February 2010 15:41 |
Add comment
We will remove any comment that is a personal attack or off-topic, abusive, exceptionally incoherent, libelous, mysogonist, obscene, phobic, profane, racist, or otherwise inappropriate. Removal for cause may occur without prior notice and repeat offenders may lose commenting privileges. These abuses and/or any attempt to post a solicitations and/or advertising, flood, spam, or otherwise disrupt TS-Si.org operations are subject to further sanctions.
All comments are subject to our terms of use and overall site policies, available under the About menu tab.




theory
The DSM is a guide to what the
The TS-Si News Service is a collaborative effort by TS-Si.org editors, contributors, and corresponding institutions. Sources can include the cited individuals and organizations, as well as TS-Si.org staff contributions. Articles and news reports do not necessarily convey official positions of TS-Si, its partners, or affiliates. We welcome your comments. Use the form below to leave a public comment or send private correspondence via the TS-Si Contact Page. We will not divulge any personal details or place you on a mailing list without your permission.
The TS-Si News Service
and the TS-Si Research Service are collaborations of TS-Si officials, staff, contributors, and corresponding institutions. The contents do not necessarily convey official positions of TS-Si or its owners, participants, partners, or affiliates.
Comments
Why would anyone wish this? First you have to understand that the APA and the DSM are not pure science or medicine, they are the products of politics and drug companies. The same ultra conservative gay male members of the APA who pushed and won exclusion of homosexuality from the DSM have an almost pathological hatred of transsexual women and further many of them blame the TG activist movement for failure of ENDA to become law. If AG becomes the default diagnosis then effectively the official position becomes all GID related conditions are psycho-sexual disorders.....i n other words HBS women become psycho-sexually disordered men along with the TGs. No politician is going to work for civil rights legislation for sexual deviant men, it will never happen and the entire TG activist movement becomes moot. These are patient men, they are willing to wait a couple of years for this to play out.
The current over the top reaction by TG activists was not only anticipated, it was counted on. It will cause an immediate "circle the wagons" mentality among those APA members who may totally disagree with Zucker and Blanchard but who's egos will not allow them to stand by without defending peers against outsider loud, obnoxious and at times vicious laypeople.
Currently AG is already in the DSM, expanded in the last revision. Privately most gender professionals will tell you the majority of those presenting for SRS fit a narrowed AG profile perfectly with HBS (classic transsexual) clients being the minority. AG is here to stay, has merit as a counter-indicat ion of classic transsexuality and standards for distinguishing it from classic transsexuality that is now in place among the psychiatric profession, clear markers for both conditions. The best case scenario would be inclusion of AG as an exclusionary class for HBS (classic transsexuality) with recognition of multiple causalities thus preserving the pure medical model. This is a compromise position that preserves surgical treatment as standard.
RSS feed for comments to this post