TS-Si is dedicated to the acceptance, medical treatment, and legal protection of individuals correcting the misalignment of their brains and their anatomical sex, while supporting their transition into society as hormonally reconstituted and surgically corrected citizens.
| Jumping The Shark With the American Psychiatric Association |
 |
 |
| Opinion - Global Warning | |||
| Lisa Jain Thompson | |||
| Saturday, 10 May 2008 17:00 | |||
Washington, DC, USA. More than 120 researchers and clinicians with expertise in  neuroscience, biology, genetics, statistics, epidemiology, public health, nursing, pediatrics and social work will form the work groups who will review scientific advances and research based information to develop the fifth edition of the APA Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-V). So who did we get to chair the workgroup on sexual and gender identity disorders (GID) ??? Here come Kenneth J. Zucker and Ray Blanchard, two Ph.D’s who, despite the ongoing research in neurobiology, believe that Harry Benjamin Syndrome (fna GID/transsexuality) is a psychological problem (not a biological condition), one that can be treated with drugs and $150 an hour therapy talks. [cf. Download of the APA News Release below.]
Kenneth J. Zucker, Ph.D., from Toronto's Centre for Addictions and Mental Health (CAMH) believes in the unproven efficacy of reparative (e.g., "ex-gay") therapy to "cure" gender-variant children. Ray Blanchard, Ph.D. Professor, Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto has published scientifically unsound research purporting that HBS women are autogynephilic (that is, paraphilic fetishists who are
sexually aroused by the thought or image of themselves as women).
Unable to make HBS men and women see the benefits of having bodies that are incongruent with their brains, Zucker proposes that he can cure them of the “delusion” they have had since birth. Ray Blanchard, a man who is unable to understand why someone would not want a penis, attests that HBS women (male to female), like Narcissus, obsess over their reflected image, imagining themselves with a vagina and breasts rather than a penis like Ray has.
Clinicians are inclined to diagnose disorders that they feel more comfortable treating. If Zucker is uncomfortable with a male to female HBS woman not wanting a penis — a body part I assume that Mr. Zucker is quite fond of — then the HBS woman must be delusional. No sane person wants to lose his penis (denying that HBS women are who they are).
If Blanchard is uncomfortable with a male to female HBS not wanting to do all those things a gay man does with a penis, then the HBS woman must be a gay man with autogynephilia who can be brought back into the gay dating fold once they fall under Mr. Blanchard’s sway. I find it quite telling that Blanchard’s faux science fails to address female to male HBS men. Perhaps Blanchard ignores them because he sees them as just women. Perhaps he believes that wanting to have a penis instead of a vagina is good thing, a step up from being born a woman.
So we have two men — Zucker and Blanchard — once again insisting that only men know best what women really need —
What is going on?
In one faction, we have the reactionary forces of the old guard, the forty-five minute hour therapists, the Ph.D. sociologists and researchers who distrust hard science and fear that the neurobiologists and the science based physical psychologists will push them off center stage. All physical evidence — MRIs, synaptic networks, neural maps — must be opposed. The mind is everything and the mind is not physical. If the mind were physical, if the
brain is physical, if being is physical, then it would be better the shrinks were good physical mechanics than bad theoretical therapists. All they have written since Freud crumbles if the hard science is admitted to be true. In another faction, we have those who religious beliefs drive their science, self-limiting their world view. They circulate “just so” stories among themselves, patting themselves on the back, joining each others’ conferences and working groups, writing lauding praises on each others’ journal articles. If the science does not meet the needs of religion, better to ignore the science, better yet, silence the research.
A third, perhaps more insidious faction are the men — heterosexual, gay, and bi – who are so physically and personally uncomfortable talking with people who don’t want their penises that they would prefer to think that HBS women do not exist. The first therapist I ever saw for HBS — ‘twas at Kaiser Permanente — was doing fine until five or ten minutes into the session I mentioned I was pre-op HBS.
So much for that shrink. The fear of losing his penis was so acute, he could not hide his anxiety from his patient.
Straight men barely understand HBS women, gay men understand us hardly ever. Everything is surface, male sex is everything, an immediate desire that must be filled. Unable to understand an HBS woman, they project their male needs and anxieties, deciding without evidence or valid scientific research that HBS women must be crazy, needing a careful male lead in therapy that returns the penis to its true place as lord and master of the world.
If only they could make HBS men and women go away, all would be right in the world once again with everyone in their proper place.
The APA is unqualified to define Harry Benjamin Syndrome or decide on appropriate treatments. Their time has come and gone. HBS is a physical birth condition not a psychological disorder treatable with words and ink blots.
Harry Benjamin Syndrome is a medical condition that originates during fetal development inside the womb. The genitals of an HBS man or woman are misaligned with our brain’s sex identity that was set before birth long before development of the other sexual organs. Sex Realignment Surgery (SRS) brings the outward genitals into agreement with the actual sex of the HBS man or woman. The end result is that their body’s genitals finally match the configuration of their brain and they are HBS no more.
So why has the APA appointed Zucker and Blanchard to the work group?
I thought that would be obvious.
The Men want back in control.
APA Names DSM-V Work Group Members: Experts to Revise Manual for Diagnosis of Mental Disorders. News Release No. 08-27. American Psychiatric Association (APA). May 1, 2008. [ Download PDF ]  Ms. Lisa Jain Thompson is a Co-Founder & Principal of TS-Si. She also serves as a Contributing Editor and columnist for the TS-Si website. She maintains another site, StarPoet.com, for her poetry and literary works.Ms. Thompson's signed articles contain her own opinions and do not necessarily convey an official position of TS-Si, its partners, or affiliates. Lisa welcomes your comments. Use the form below or email via her TS-Si Contact Page. We will not divulge any personal details or place you on a mailing list without your permission.
|
|||
| Last Updated on Saturday, 17 May 2008 17:44 |
Add comment
TS-Si often publishes material that presents challenges and insights worthy of extended discussion. We encourage lively, open debate and ask that you show respect for others with responsible comments. This can be done with emotional maturity and intelligence. Before commenting, please thoroughly read the article and other comments, then stay on topic. Address the issues without presumptions about the author(s) or other persons.
We will remove any comment that is a personal attack or off-topic, abusive, exceptionally incoherent, libelous, mysogonist, obscene, phobic, profane, racist, or otherwise inappropriate. Removal for cause may occur without prior notice and repeat offenders may lose commenting privileges. These abuses and/or any attempt to post a solicitations and/or advertising, flood, spam, or otherwise disrupt TS-Si.org operations are subject to further sanctions.
All comments are subject to our terms of use and overall site policies, available under the About menu tab.
We will remove any comment that is a personal attack or off-topic, abusive, exceptionally incoherent, libelous, mysogonist, obscene, phobic, profane, racist, or otherwise inappropriate. Removal for cause may occur without prior notice and repeat offenders may lose commenting privileges. These abuses and/or any attempt to post a solicitations and/or advertising, flood, spam, or otherwise disrupt TS-Si.org operations are subject to further sanctions.
All comments are subject to our terms of use and overall site policies, available under the About menu tab.
The TS-Si News Service
and the TS-Si Research Service are collaborations of TS-Si officials, staff, contributors, and corresponding institutions. The contents do not necessarily convey official positions of TS-Si or its owners, participants, partners, or affiliates.
Comments
I couldn't agree more with you on the danger presented by the appointment of a dangerous reparatave therapist like Zucker to chair this DSM V workgroup committee. I have been troubled by the recent All Things Considered segment on NPR that described the effect of Zucker's abuse on one of his young victims. I don't have any idea what the powers at the APA might have been thinking when they made this appointment. What can we do about this?
It's bad enough that the APA pathologizes adults with a "mental disorder" when HBS is really a medical condition (albeit one that when untreated or suppressed can have psychiatric side effects), but I cannot stand by silently when the organization flies in the face of the principle of its own February 1998 condemnation of reparative therapy, to name a notorious reparative therapist who abuses children as a part of his treatment regimen to chair this committee.
Where do we sign up?
Joann
Oh, wait a minute...I think I get it. There's a common refrain among the working-class when finding themselves overloaded with work, "Hey, think of it as job security!" Well, similarly, perhaps the APA, being a group of practicing and practical psychiatrists (right?), are enacting their own form of guaranteed job security. With the proliferation of transgenderism over the last decade or so, what better route to ensure sustained job security than to have Zucker and Blanchard merge their beliefs into the NEW and IMPROVED DSM where GID will morph into a newer, bigger, brighter, shinier, more needy form of psychological disorder in need of doctoring and psychological salvation? Brilliant! Absolutely brilliant!! Kudos to the APA for their legendary foresight in the art of self-preservation.
As soon as I get back from the bathroom after throwing up, I intend to write some letters.
One thing for sure: a lot of people will get public funding for bunch of academic conferences and forgettable academic papers.
Let's hope that by 2010 they all go away ...
Diane harrybenjaminsyndrome.org/
RSS feed for comments to this post