Linköping, Sweden. Human beings can learn by emulating others, but exploring one's environment is an important part of the learning process. To grow up is to make mistakes, score successes, and learn from experience. What about robots? Can they learn the same way? And if they do, what can we humans learn from their experience and skills? A team of researchers have developed an artificial cognitive system that learns from experience and observation rather than relying on predefined rules and models.

 

Traditional robotics relies on having the robots carry out complex calculations, such as measuring the geometry of an object and its expected trajectory if moved. But COSPAL has turned this around, making the robots perform tasks based on their own experiences and observations of humans. This trial and error approach could lead to more autonomous robots and even improve our understanding of the human brain.

 

“Gösta Granlund, head of the Computer Vision Laboratory at Linköping University, came up with the concept that action precedes perception in learning. That may sound counterintuitive, but it is exactly how humans learn,” explains Michael Felsberg, coordinator of the EU-funded COSPAL.

 

Children, he notes, are “always testing and trying everything” and by performing random actions – poking this object or touching that one — they come to understand cause and effect and can apply that knowledge in the future. By experimenting, they quickly find out, for example, that a ball rolls and that a hole cannot be grasped. Children also learn from observing adults and copying their actions, gaining greater understanding of the world around them.

 

Learning from humans to learn like … humans

 

Applied in the context of an artificial cognitive system (ACS), the approach helps to create robots that learn much as humans do and can learn from humans, allowing them to continue to perform tasks even when their environment changes or when objects they are not pre-programmed to recognise are placed in front of them.

 

“Most artificial intelligence-based ACS architectures are quite successful in recognising objects based on geometric calculations of visual inputs. Some people argue that

humans also perform such calculations to identify something, but I don’t think so. I think humans are just very good at recognising the geometry of objects from experience,” Felsberg says.

 

The COSPAL team’s ACS would seem to bear out that theory. A robot with no pre-programmed geometric knowledge was able to recognize objects simply from experience. And this was true even when its surroundings and the position of the camera through which it obtained its visual information changed.

 

Getting the right peg in the right hole

 

A shape-sorting puzzle of the sort used to teach small children was used to test the system. Through trial and error and observation, the robot was able to place cubes in square holes and round pegs in round holes with an accuracy of 2mm and 2 degrees. “It showed that, without knowing geometry, it can solve geometric problems,” Felsberg notes.

 

“In fact, I observed my 11-month-old son solving the same puzzle and the learning process you could see unfolding with both him and the robot was remarkably similar.”

 

Another test of the robot’s ability to learn from observation involved the use of a robotic arm that copied the movement of a human arm. With as few as 20 to 60 observations, the robotic arm was able to trace the movement of the human arm through a constrained space, avoiding obstacles on the way. In subsequent trials with the same robot, the learning period was greatly reduced, suggesting that the ACS was indeed drawing on memories of past observations.

 

In addition, by applying concepts akin to fuzzy logic, the team came up with a new means of making the robot identify corresponding signals and symbols such as colours. Most digital image processing applications specify three numbers to represent a red, green and blue component. Instead, the team made the system learn colours from pairs of images and corresponding sets of reference colour names (such as red, dark red, blue and dark blue). This is a representation known as channel coding. Similar to how colours are identified by the human brain with sets of neurons firing selectively to differentiate green from black, for example, channel coding offers a biologically inspired way of representing information.

 

“As humans, we can use reason to deduce what an object is by a process of elimination, i.e. we know that if something has such and such a property it must be this item, not that one. Though this type of machine reasoning has been used before, we have developed an advanced version for object recognition that uses symbolic and visual information to great effect,” Felsberg says.

 

 

To create link towards this article on your website,
copy and paste the text below in your page.

<style type="text/css"><!--.quote {width:400px; padding: 6px; border: solid 1px #456B8F; font: 11px helvetica, verdana, sans-serif; color: #222222; background-color: #ffffff}.quote a {font: 13px arial, serif; color: #003399; text-decoration: underline}.quote a:hover {color: #FF9900; }//--></style><div style="float:left;padding:5px;"><img src="http://ts-si.org/images/stories/RoboticMindsCOSPAL.jpg" width="125" alt="" /></div><div class="quote"><a href="http://ts-si.org/horizons/3101-does-action-precede-perception-in-human-and-robot-learning" target="_blank">Does Action Precede Perception In Human And Robot Learning?</a><br />Tuesday, 08 April 2008<div align="right" style="width:400px"><p style="text-align:right;"><a href="http://ts-si.org/" target="_blank">TS-Si.org</a></p></div></div>

Preview :

Name

Email

Website

Title

Comment

smaller | larger

I have read and agree to the Terms of Usage.

Add Comment