TS-Si
is dedicated to the acceptance, medical treatment, and legal protection of individuals correcting the misalignment of their brains and their anatomical sex, while supporting their transition into society.
is dedicated to the acceptance, medical treatment, and legal protection of individuals correcting the misalignment of their brains and their anatomical sex, while supporting their transition into society.

TS-Si supports
open access to
publicly funded research
| Running With The Pack: Young Men, Testosterone, And Acting Out |
|
|
| Opinion - Global Warning | |||
| Lisa Jain Thompson | |||
| Saturday, 16 February 2008 19:00 | |||
Springfield, VA, USA. Lawrence King, 15, was declared brain dead last Wednesday (as I write this), a victim of male on male violence in middle school for violating the rules of the pack. His body remains on a ventilator in Ventura County so that his organs may be harvested to help others. His assailant, a 14 year old male, now faces a first-degree murder charge and trial as an adult [cf. Note.]. Lawrence King’s offense, the one for which his assailant was judge and jury? He wore high heels, make-up, finger nail polish, and jewelry to school and told people he was gay. For this offence, King was shot in the head early Tuesday in a classroom full of students at E.O. Green Junior High School. As was pointed out by one of his male classmates (age 13), King
The suspect shot King at least twice at the beginning of the school day and then fled the campus. He was apprehended a few blocks away and, in all probability, will be charged as an adult under California State Law.
Police have not determined a motive in the slaying but said it appeared to stem from a personal dispute between King and the suspect. Several students, however, said that the assault was a result of an argument over King’s sexual orientation: that he wore feminine clothing and make-up, and proclaimed he was gay.
The day before the shooting, King and several boys had some kind of altercation during the lunch period. The school's staff was aware that King was having problems fitting in with the other students, including the suspect, and had offered both students help.
King’s concerns. King’s issues. Not the assailant’s.
The assailant was described as a calm, smart student who played on the basketball team. He wasn’t the type of kid who would murder someone. He was just one of many middle school boys.
Both the assailant and his family have declared that they are terribly sad to learn [King] is brain-dead. The assailant’s attorney, Brian Vogel, has said that the assailant and the boy's family were also hurting.
Student Averi Laskey, 13, said she had known King since grammar school and liked him. She said that only in the last two weeks had he begun dressing in a feminine manner.
Laskey said she also knew the assailant and had shared an English honors class with him.
Those are the facts of the case at this point of time:
From the boys' point of view, King obviously bears the major portion of the blame for his own death: he violated the rules of the pack. From the girls' point of view, they don’t understand how this could have happened.
The pressure of the pack, the shear weight of societal expectations of what it means to be male without providing men and boys a clear means to be so, distorts the efforts of young males to come to terms with who they are and how they should act. When all else fails, the rules of the pack override all other concerns.
Much of this is on instinctive level where testosterone influences neurobiology and brain structure. Most of this is an unconscious part of young and adult male behavior patterns.
Boys and men who violate the rules are ostracized from the boys club. They are loners who must strike out on their own without the protection of being an accepted member of the pack.
Most conflicts within a group of males are not severe. Behavior may appear severe to outsiders (ritualistic threats and posturing, shouting and minor fights), but most problems are resolved peaceably within the rules of the pack. Rarely does the dominant male have his authority seriously challenged.
Each and every member of the pack is constantly watchful that the rules are being followed. If a member strays from the accepted rules or directly confronts them, the pack will persecute the offender until order is restored.
In his way, Lawrence King challenged the rules of the pack and the authority of a male who was at least more dominant than King. He threatened the fragile stability of adolescent boys struggling to come to terms with being male.
Conflict was probably inevitable, the violent outcome was not. It is the responsibility of the adult community, who seemingly should know better, to place restraints on adolescent behavior, especially the tendency of boys to run in a pack.
To that extent the school is at fault for being too passive and not becoming actively involved in what was an obvious growing conflict. But schools run in packs also, influenced by parents, politics, and religious beliefs, and most would rather not become publicly involved with gay adolescents.
Few people have been fired for failure to act; many have come under fire for “backing special rights for the gay community” and promoting “aberrant sexual behavior and perversion.”
To that extent, society as a whole is at fault, for being more concerned about the political power structure and the religious rights of conservative believers than the rights and life of one gay student. Society continues to express its horror (and its feigned surprise) but does little to resolve the basic issues.
Much of the anger and hatred exhibited against gay men is the result of male pack behavior: the outsider, the boy who does not conform to the rules, the boy who is different is the enemy and must be either brought into the pack or eliminated. Society calls this
To that extent, the assailant's parents are at fault for allowing a child to grow up resentful of someone who is gay. Behavior exhibited at school is also exhibited at home around the dinner table. Hatred and homophobia start in the interactions between parent and child and may be reinforced by religious beliefs and indoctrination.
To that extent, all of the parents of all the students are at fault for allowing (and sometimes encouraging) the behavior of the pack to act against outsiders. If we allow boys to be unbridled boys, if we encourage them to live isolated from the adult world around them, if we do not give them living role models for acceptable male behavior, if we glorify violence as the best means to resolve our differences, we cannot then pretend innocent separation from dysfunctional male pack behavior and absolve ourselves of guilt.
To that extent, the parents of Lawrence King are at fault for pretending that we live in an ideal world, free of hate and bigotry, for not preparing their gay child for life in that world, for not warning him of the possible consequences of his actions. If you are going to live outside the law of the pack, you have to be honest.
Although an ideal world may separate cause and effect, life does not.
Someone needed to make sure Lawrence King knew the risks he was running by appearing to be different from everyone else. We needed to make sure that he had the social skills to live the life he wanted to live. It is one thing to say everyone has the right to dress and live anyway they may wish. In an ideal world this would be true. But Lawrence King lived in a world of adolescent boys, where the pack rules and non-conformity is punished by social ostracization, where gay behavior may be met with religious damnation and physical confrontation.
Lawrence King was not killed by a gun. He was killed by parents and a society that allows homophobia and encourages the distrust of outsiders (non-Christians, communists, Arabs, Hispanic emigrants), a society that allows boys to be boys and then turns its collective head.
Lawrence King’s only fault was that he forgot that he was a boy running with a pack of other boys. For that, they took his life.
Note. The suspect in this case has been charged as an adult this week with first-degree murder with the special allegation of a hate crime. Since the suspect is a minor child, TS-Si.org will not identify the person by name pending conclusion of all applicable court proceedings.
To create link towards this article on your website, copy and paste the text below in your page. Preview : ![]()
Set as favorite
Email This
Comments (2)
![]() Write comment
|
|||
| Last Updated on Saturday, 23 February 2008 14:53 |





Lawrence King’s offense, the one for which his assailant was judge and jury? He wore high heels, make-up, finger nail polish, and jewelry to school and told people he was gay.
Ms. Lisa Jain Thompson






















The TS-Si News Service
and the TS-Si Research Service
are collaborations of TS-Si officials, staff, contributors, and corresponding institutions. Contents do not necessarily convey official positions of
TS-Si, its partners, or its affiliates.