RSS Feed: TS-Si News Service. RSS Feed: TS-Si Research Service. TS-Si Reader Comments. Delicious: TS-Si News Service. Digg: TS-Si News Service.
Pinterest.
StumbleUpon. Facebook: TS-Si News Service.
GooglePlus: TS-Si News Service.
Twitter: Follow TS-Si News Service.

TS-Si is dedicated to the acceptance, medical treatment, and legal protection of individuals correcting the misalignment of their brains and their anatomical sex, while supporting their transition into society as hormonally reconstituted and surgically corrected citizens.
TS-Si supports open access to publicly funded research.

Leave a comment.
Thought Experiment: Gender Theory And The Naked Truth Print E-mail
Opinion - Global Warning
Lisa Jain Thompson   
Tuesday, 29 January 2008 19:00
Lisa Jain Thompson
Global Warning: Lisa Jain Thompson
Springfield, VA, USA. Thought experiments are devices of the imagination used to investigate the nature of things.
 
We need only list a few of the well-known thought experiments to be reminded of their enormous influence and importance in the sciences: Newton's bucket, Maxwell's demon, Einstein's elevator, Heisenberg's gamma-ray microscope, Schrödinger's cat. So let's think about Transgenders, shall we?
 
A thought experiment:
 
Two transgenders, a female with a penis and a male with breasts and vagina, arrive dressed gender appropriately at a nudist camp. After checking into their room, they take off their gender appropriate clothes and go to happy hour out around the swimming pool. All the other guests are out there, men and women, male and female, drinking mojitos, and chatting each other up. Perhaps liaisons are being arranged.
 
Question:
 
Without their gender appropriate clothes, what is the sex and gender of the female with a penis and the male with breasts and vagina? Is the female with a penis still a woman and the male with breasts and vagina still a man?
 
Areas requiring further research:
  1. How do the other nude guests perceive the sex and gender of the female with a penis and the male with breasts and vagina?
     
  2. Which reality is an accurate description of the physical world: The perception of the other unclothed guests at the nudist camp or the conceptualization of the naked female with a penis and naked male with breasts and vagina?
I'm serious.
 
Really.
 
You just are going to have to try and give this thought experiment thing a chance. I mean it's not like anyone would try to do this in real life, would they?
 
A little background. A thought experiment is the use of a hypothetical scenario to help us explore and understand the way things actually are. Below is a famous example (You can skip this part if you want and come back in a couple paragraphs down.)
 
Schrödinger wrote [2]:
Schrödinger's cat.One can even set up quite ridiculous cases. A cat is penned up in a steel chamber, along with the following device (which must be secured against direct interference by the cat): in a Geiger counter there is a tiny bit of radioactive substance, so small, that perhaps in the course of the hour one of the atoms decays, but also, with equal probability, perhaps none; if it happens, the counter tube discharges and through a relay releases a hammer which shatters a small flask of hydrocyanic aid. If one has left this entire system to itself for an hour, one would say that the cat still lives if meanwhile no atom has decayed. The psi-function of the entire system would express this by having in it the living and dead cat (pardon the expression) mixed or smeared out in equal parts.
 
It is typical of these cases that an indeterminacy originally restricted to the atomic domain becomes transformed into macroscopic indeterminacy, which can then be resolved by direct observation. That prevents us from so naively accepting as valid a "blurred model" for representing reality. In itself it would not embody anything unclear or contradictory. There is a difference between a shaky or out-of-focus photograph and a snapshot of clouds and fog banks.
-- Usually stated as
The cat is in the locked box. Is the cat dead or alive before you open the box and learn its status?
Now back to our naked transgenders.
Two transgenders, a female with a penis and a male with breasts and vagina, arrive in gender appropriate dress at a nudist camp.
Gender theory asserts that gender is a social construct (clothes, social roles, etc.), that, if left alone, men and women would exhibit no significant gender differences. The transgender movement extends the gender assertion to include physical sex: females can have a penis, males can have breasts and a vagina. Except for some incidentals that don't amount for much, the transgender movement asserts that sex is also a social construct. You are what you say you are no matter how you prefer your genitals to be.
 
Thus we have the two transgenders: one a female with a penis, the other a male with breasts and vagina, dressed appropriately for those socially constructed sexes and genders.
After checking into their room, they take off their gender appropriate clothes and go to happy hour out around the swimming pool.
The two transgenders have arrived at a nudist camp, requiring that they be naked, stripped of their cultural costumes and clothing.
All the other guests are out there, men and women, male and female, drinking mojitos and chatting each other up.
At the happy hour, the other guests, who are not transgendered, sans gender theory social constructs, are naked around the pool. Merriment and alcohol are pursued by all.
 
We continue.
Without their gender appropriate clothes, what is the sex and gender of the female with a penis and the male with breasts and vagina?
A key concern of human existence (following close after food, shelter, and survival) is sex. Sometimes sex seems to our number one concern.
 
The absolute first thing we notice and catalog when we meet a person for the first time is their sex, subconsciously if not consciously. The sex of a stranger is a key to species survival: males are physically more dangerous and may be a threat to the group; females are significantly less physically dangerous and provide opportunities to reproduce and continue the species.
 
Sex is important so we look.
Is the female with a penis still a woman and the male with breasts and vagina still a man?
The transgender movement says yes. Sex is a social construct. The female with a penis is still a woman because she says she is. The male with breasts and vagina, and perhaps a period, is still a man because he says he is. To the transgender community, actual genitalia is immaterial except as has been noted elsewhere "the one thing most transgendered people seem to do is insist on talking about their genitals. [3]"
 
However, most of the human race believes not only that genitalia exist for a reason but that penises and vaginas make a difference in our life experiences and how we approach the world.
 
Which leads to further questions.
How do the other nude guests perceive the sex and gender of the female with a penis and the male with breasts and vagina?
My limited experience (a handful of decades) suggests that when a human male sees another person with breasts and vagina, he perceives a female human. Likewise, when a human female sees a person with a penis, especially if it is erect, she perceives a male human. Little ambiguity would seem to exist in their perception.
 
Perhaps transgenders see the world differently, but if they do, they need to present a rational scientific explanation why physical biology is unrelated to their sex construct — why the perception of the other nude guests is wrong. The transgender movement must present their argument coherently supported by the appropriate neurobiological research.
 
Sociological explanations and papers are insufficient to explain the impact of physical genitalia on human existence. Just to say there is no impact is not nearly enough. Where is the beef, the hard scientific evidence that supports the transgender assertion?
Which reality is an accurate description of the physical world: The perception of the other unclothed guests at the nudist camp or the conceptualization of the naked female with a penis and naked male with breasts and vagina?
Without a rational scientific basis and evidence to support the transgender explanation that the neurobiological binary sex construct perceived by most adult humans is wrong, the explanation with the fewest possible assumptions must be taken as correct (or at least as a closer approximation of reality). The perception of the other unclothed guests are correct and the transgender assertion must be viewed as fallacious:
The naked transgender with a penis is male;
 
The naked transgender with breasts and a vagina is female.
Clothes do not make one male or female, a woman or a man.
 
Neither does political polemics.
 
The sex binary exists, fully supported by both the neurobiology of the human animal and ongoing scientific and medical research
 
— despite the best efforts of the transgender community to the contrary.
 

 
1. Thought Experiments. James Robert Brown. In: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford Univerity. 2007.
 
2. E. Schrödinger, Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik, Naturwissenschaften 23: pp.807-812; 823-828; 844-849 (1935).
 
The Present Situation In Quantum Mechanics: A Translation Of "Cat Pardix Paper". Erwin Schrödinger; Translator: John D. Trimmer. This translation was originally published in Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 124, 323-38.
 
Appeared as Section I.11 of Part I of Quantum Theory and Measurement. J.A. Wheeler and W.H. Zurek, eds. Princeton university Press. New Jersey 1983. [ Full Text (PDF) ]
 
 
Ms. Lisa Jain ThompsonMs. Lisa Jain Thompson is a Co-Founder & Principal of TS-Si. She also serves as a Contributing Editor and columnist for the TS-Si website. She maintains another site, StarPoet.com, for her poetry and literary works.

Ms. Thompson's signed articles contain her own opinions and do not necessarily convey an official position of TS-Si, its partners, or affiliates. Lisa welcomes your comments. Use the form below or email via her TS-Si Contact Page. We will not divulge any personal details or place you on a mailing list without your permission.
 
Last Updated on Saturday, 02 February 2008 14:39
 

Comments   

 
# Ok so i think I was nice in my other post but...Mara 2008-01-29 23:38
For one, here is it in simple lamens terms for your "complex" mind.

Who cares what the other guests view the people as, A transgendered person is that way because it is for themselves, it is about self acceptance. DUH...

If transistion was all about getting the world to see me a man or woman then it would be empty and pointless and would have been shot down decades ago, by any educated person.

The fact is those people feel that they are whatever gender they relate to...

I mean is this getting through to you....????

Its more a thing for self acceptance than public acceptance...

Its just like being gay, one doesnt need scientific facts to understand that a person admits to being gay because he wants to accept himself for what he is....

You really are the most cynical person I have ever read of, you seem to be the most thickheaded ignorant individual that is transgendered ever...

I shudder to think of all the harm you do to the very society you are a part of whether you like it or not, but to be honest why dont you just accept yourself and stop posting this incredible rubish bull[deleted]. GET On with your life, and stop being so damn stuck on the fact that your transgendered, stop trying to make it OK, and just move past it. Jeeze what a bitch you are seriously....
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
# Dear Ms. Girly GirlLisa Thompson 2008-01-30 00:51
Tell me darlin' what are the answers to the questions? They only way you can't care is if you are locked up in a closet where you are never seen. All you've done is attack, you are an answer to nothing.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
# For MaraSharon S. Gaughan 2008-01-30 02:02
TS-Si.org welcomes responsible comment on its content. This applies to either the articles or an opinion column (such as "Global Warning" by Lisa Jain Thompson). We have many correspondents in our private contact mail and in the public comment areas. Even in disagreement, most of our visitors show respect and a thoughtful consideration of the issues.

Our acceptance of responsible comment excludes personal insults and/or invective. Your comment on this column includes such language:
Quote:
You really are the most cynical person I have ever read of, you seem to be the most thickheaded ignorant individual that is transgendered ever...

I shudder to think of all the harm you do to the very society you are a part of whether you like it or not, but to be honest why dont you just accept yourself and stop posting this incredible rubish bulls**t. GET On with your life, and stop being so damn stuck on the fact that your transgendered, stop trying to make it OK, and just move past it. Jeeze what a bitch you are seriously....
TS-Si.org has no response to the emotional or intellectual substance of your remarks - or even their tone. However, we can state clearly that the personal insults are unnecessary, counterproducti ve, and unacceptable.

Please feel free to comment further on any of our content. While we welcome your views, please be advised that posts must adhere to mature standards of discourse. Otherwise, they are subject to deletion without further discussion.

Sharon Gaughan
TS-Si.org Managing Editor
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
# A female with a what?Jillian 2008-01-30 04:32
I got lost at the beginning. When you say "a female with a penis", do you mean someone who was born female and then acquired the penis, or someone who was born male and still has a penis but lives as a female? A second question: wouldn't cultural assumptions of the guests enter into the question? Definitely an interesting thought experiment, however.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
# Diane Kearny 2008-01-30 04:34
Why is it that those like Mara always identify us as if we belong to the psychological construct of transgender and demand, yes I said demand, we identify as being just like them. And, God forbid, someone should make the point as did Lisa that they are sexually defined as that which they present physically when in the nude. I can just imagine the laughter when a male with a penis goes to a nudist colony and exclaims he is actually a female.

The transgender do not accept the driven need of others to correct their body to reflect their brain. That is unacceptable to them for how would they explain to others what rung on the self constructed ladder of choice the transgender might have climbed? Seems as long as they place the HBS/TS on that TG ladder they have legitimacy but if we are not there to give them credence then they simply have their delusions as cover.

Mara, I do not do you harm as you do to me. I do not decide your clothes; do not demand you be open and proud; do not label others with a 'trans' confusion identity; do not insist you have surgery or even take hormones; do not mis-label you and condemn you for not accepting my identity as your own. But, on the other hand you and others DEMAND I be classed as if an element under your TG umbrella identity. No my dear, if I might enter a nudist colony I would not enter as a transgender or trans anything but as the woman I am proud to be and would be welcome for I present as to what I am and not as I demand others accept in contradiction of obvious facts.

Diane
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
# Diane Kearny 2008-01-30 04:43
Mara, one additional point I might add. Transgender was never the 'community' I belonged to since my identity and diagnosis was established long before the transvestite guru coined his now famous and confusing term upon even those who have no connection with it.

Diane
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
# DianeMara 2008-01-30 10:30
Then you missed my point completely I am not saying we need to be Trans anything, we are woman or men, despite ones societital appreance or impression, if a man wants to enter a nudist colony but physically has a vagina, who cares, but you seem very stuck on the point you will be laughed at...

I am truly sorry that some of the people of this particular website are so focused on the social aspect you indite. Gender identity is just that, it is something that cisgendered, and gender variant people deal with and it is for ourselves to conquer not others.

I just cant get over the fact that people here are acually trying thier hardest to find some bad in thier being gender variant, why are you all looking for the evil in it???

Why cant you just accept that maybe its ok for a man to have a vagina, or a woman a peins, you all are so clearly focused on ones genitalia and not on not thier minds.

I mean no harm, and I apoligize my above post was nasty but like the title said my other post on the other article was much more well spoken, and then i decided to read further into Lisas work and noticed that she is a off kilter individual in my opinion, and clearly needs to further do research before declaring herslef knowledgable to write regarding the issues she brings to hand.

Dont get me wrong her question she brings to the table is a good one, she just supports it in a absent way, and as I said in my other reply to another column a first year pysch student could have written a more insightful, intelligent, and progressive column.

Simply put I do not appreciate Lisa's work.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
# Female with a PenisLisa Thompson 2008-01-30 12:28
The Transgender Conceptualizato n: A woman with a penis is the transgender conceptualizato n that says that a transgender person who, although physically male in all parts with all the original manufacturer equipment including a penis , says that she is a woman because she dresses and presents as a woman.

What is so hard to grasp about that? Transgender persons in that configuration write me all the time to tell me that

1. They like their penis, they don't want to get rid of their penis, they get pleasure from their penis, and

2. They are a woman.

Makes sense to them.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
# Dear Unappreciating MaraLisa Thompson 2008-01-30 12:42
Mara wrote: Why cant you just accept that maybe its ok for a man to have a vagina, or a woman a peins, you all are so clearly focused on ones genitalia and not on not thier minds. [end quote]

Mara dearest, their is a difference between sex and gender. You (and the rest of the transgender movement) are so obsessed with gender (the social role and clothing expected by society) that you over look the nose on your face (or the lack of it).

GENDER IS NOT SEX. TRANSGENDER IS NOT HBS.

HBS is a medical condition in which HBS men and women need to bring their outward physical genitalia into conformance with the sex identity of their brain that was set before birth.

I do not ask you to appreciate me, Mara, I ask you to think, and think logically and not with your hormones and emotions. Instead all you present me with is adolescent attitude.

Write me when you have lived in the real world for a while -- say in about ten years -- but only after you have learned to discuss your situation as working adult.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
# Mara 2008-01-30 15:55
I'll quote you here:

"The Transgender Conceptualizato n: A woman with a penis is the transgender conceptualizato n that says that a transgender person who, although physically male in all parts with all the original manufacturer equipment including a penis , says that she is a woman because she dresses and presents as a woman."


See I think you have it wrong, maybe the TS individuals you know say that or feel that way, but did it ever occur to you that there are people who feel they are woman not becasuse of the way they dress or present.

You my friend are focusing on clothing and social roles.

Look deeper and ask yourself is it really all about your clothing or social roles that makes you a woman???

Because its not, I think you may have a crossdresser confused with Transexuality here???

I found it hilarious that you Judge individuals so rashly without considering that there are opposing viewpoints to every argument, Like I said earlier, I think your thesis is GREAT!!! and it should be studied to a greater degree, and it is...

But your articles do not match up with your investigations and many of your facts are highly misguided and very bias.

Yet you claim:

TS-SI:Dedicated to the acceptance, medical treatment, & legal protection of individuals in the process of changing their anatomical sex, & supporting their transition into society.



I laughed so hard that you are the President of this website yet you have the ovaries to declare your transphobic attitude and nature in your articles.

You are confusing at best...

Please understand that I really apoligize to come off rude and I did apoligize earlier, and In case you didnt read that I will reapoligize again for any childish attitude, I have done my best to convey my thoughts to you here and have a appropiate discussion with you, in fact I would love to talk with you regarding these articles in a appropiate manner, send me a e-mail.

I am all for a well mannered debate of ideas, and i think there is alot I could learn from you. So please write me if you wish.

thank you for your time.

Mara
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
# The basics in short declarative sentences with a limited, common english vocabularyLisa Thompson 2008-01-30 16:10
Men have penises, woman have vaginas; males have poles, females have holes.

"A woman's love is her whole being, a man's love is a thing apart."
-- various versions from various poets
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
# My innappropaite languageMara 2008-01-30 16:28
I found it funny that my potty mouth has upset you so: there just words right?

Whats funny is your:

"Perhaps the F word was the proper choice for the situation, the perfect word that encapsulated both the student's frustration and the quality of the student's answers. Even Shakespeare used obscenities when they were the exactly right word and an appropriate expression of his intentions. Then again, they are only words after all and who gives a flying f..?"

Remeber writing that, oh and do you think your TS issues from a long derived love of XENA, like you just really want to be her or something????

I think I really question your existence miss Lisa...
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
# What are your qualifications anyway???Mara 2008-01-30 16:30
What are your qualifications anyway???What are your qualifications anyway???What are your qualifications anyway???What are your qualifications anyway???What are your qualifications anyway???
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
# MaraSharon S. Gaughan 2008-01-30 16:37
Enough. Posting a flood is enough to be blocked from further posting of any kind.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
# Mara's Questionable ExistenceLisa Thompson 2008-01-30 16:38
How long have you been stalking me Mara? What has it been, 10 years now? You really are obsessed.

If you really doubt my existence, feel free to come to Pentagon and I will take you on a tour. (but be forewarned that we take photos of all the visitors)

As for now, Mara, you are just as tiresome as ever and no wittier.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
# Mara's qualificationsLisa Thompson 2008-01-30 16:41
TS-Si staff is composed of working scientists, therapists, teachers and professors, post-op HBS and their families, IT professionals, medical researchers, etc.

Mara, on the other hand, is Mara
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
# So which of the above are you?Mara 2008-01-30 16:54
So which of the above are you?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
# Come to the Pentagon, MaraLisa Thompson 2008-01-30 17:00
If you have questions, all will be answered there.

Or maybe not.

But as for now, quit using this as a blog and spamming this site.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
# utterly brilliant!Cathryn aka Cat Kisser 2008-01-31 06:42
I laughed, I cried, I nearly peed my pants.........

Lisa, I found this while on the phone with a friend, a forensic psychiatrist and read it to her.......we both think you are a freakin' genius!

I had started to write an essay about pie solidarity and apples then declaring henceforth all fruit must be called apples.......bu t you blew it out of the water with this.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
# hmmm...Cathryn aka Cat Kisser 2008-01-31 06:49
If we put Mara in a box...........
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
# Editor's NoteSharon S. Gaughan 2008-01-31 07:27
Certain visitors have been prevented from posting any further comments due to violations of the TS-Si.org Terms of Service.

TS-Si welcomes responsible comments. Please be respectful of others. We reserve the right to delete a comment that is abusive, exceptionally incoherent, off-topic, or uses excessive foul language. We will not tolerate comments that contains homophobic, racist, sexist, transphobic, or other slurs, or consists of a solicitation and/or advertising.

Any attempt to flood, spam, or otherwise disrupt TS-Si.org operations are subject to further sanctions.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
# My two centsAmy 2008-02-01 05:12
I just wanted to give my two cents about this after running into the article. I like the quesiton you propose, because it's very thought provoking, but you seem to make one assumption that I wish to clarify.

I would agree that if I saw someone who had a penis I would assume they are a male. Similarly if I saw a person with breasts and a vagina I would assume they are a female. In fact I would not be wrong. They are in fact a biological male nad female (excluding intersex), respectively.

However, that does not imply that my assumtpion/obse rvation is accurate.

The difference lies in the distinction between gender and sex. "Gender is between the ears, sex is between the legs". Thus, someone who has a penis and identifies as a female is infact both a male and a female. A male sex and a female gender.

Instead of asking how others would preceive this person, one should instead ask, how should we. Just as I could assume that someone who listens to one rap song likes rap, but instead they could just like that one song. Similarly, here you have pointed out one element (biological) that makes someone with a penis a "man" and someone with breasts and a vagina "female".

However there are other attribtes. I'm not talking about the clothes we wear, or even the mannerisms we use. Instead, I'm talking about how we identify. Just as listening to one rap song doesn't mean that I like rap, having a penis doesn't make me a man nor does having a vagina make me a woman. Instead, it's a question of identity, gender identity.

You propose the scenario: "Perhaps transgenders see the world differently, but if they do, they need to present a rational scientific explanation why physical biology is unrelated to their sex construct — why the perception of the other nude guests is wrong."

You essentially ask someone else to give rational behind why biology is unrealed to sex (used to describe gender). Also, you asked why the perception of the other nude guests is wrong. However, the other guests are not wrong, it is in fact a person with a vagina and a person with a penis. The only "wrong" is that the assumption is made by the group that the person with a penis is in fact a man and visa-versa. As forementioned, we are conditioned to think this is the case, but no different than if you hear me play a rap song, you may be quick to assert that I like rap music as a whole, whereas I only liked that one song. Therefore, it's not that they other guests are "wrong", but that the conclusion was unfounded in this case.

Also, as mentioned in other comments, someone who is trangender doesn't need to prove they are transgender, just as you don't have to prove you are cisgender (which I'm assuming you are cisgender by your post and given confusion of gender identity). Thus, the burden doesn't lie on the person who is transgender to prove who they are, because they already know. Instead, the burden lies on you, because you are the confused one, not them.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
# I've *been* to a nudist campAnonymous 2008-02-01 19:14
Um, hi. I'm transgender, I live as a woman and I have a penis and I went to a nudist camp with some friends last summer and yes the clothes came off. Some of the other guests were confused because my body doesn't fit the normal male/female categories so well. But no one was hostile and their attitude was that all bodies are welcomed. I spent most of the time swimming in the lake and didn't talk to very many people so I didn't get gendered much and it felt like people were avoiding pronouns because they weren't sure.

Instead of being hung up on whether i'm perceived as male or female, I enjoy my body. I'm different and I'm beautiful.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
# TG's always have to justify themselvesPam Dunn 2008-02-02 00:14
Why is it TG's such a Mara always feel the need to justify themselves and don't even have the courage to admit they don't want an operation to "mutilate" their bodies. Like one I heard say "i think of my penis as a giant clit i use to give pleasure to women", oh yeah honey. If I was in a nudist camp and saw a penis wagging at me, I'd know I was looking at a male and if that male declared they were a "female", I'd probably think a "gay male". Now there are HBS people who, as was pointed out, are non-op for a variety of reasons, some physical and some monetary and this doesn't disparage them.

Pamela
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
# Dear two centsLisa Thompson 2008-02-02 05:34
My gender is not confused, you, and all the rest of the transgendered movement, are the confusion. Feel free to go your own way, do your own thing and all of that, just quit trying to drag us into your precious world view.

You spend all your time just testifying and justify. Try getting out of your closets, admitting proudly who you are, and just living your lives for a change.

While you are doing so, quit trying to control our lives -- it's a very male behavior on your part.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
# Nudism isn't about Sex!Anna 2009-12-14 10:27
Perhaps liaisons are being arranged.

No "liaisons" AREN'T being arranged.

Not at a true nudist resort. Perhaps like at a place like Paradise Lakes or Caliente but the American Association for Nude Recreation (AANR) has removed them from their charter.

True nudist clubs AREN'T about sex. Anyone overheard planning a "liaison" would be immediately removed from the club and put on a black list!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 

Add comment

TS-Si often publishes material that presents challenges and insights worthy of extended discussion. We encourage lively, open debate and ask that you show respect for others with responsible comments. This can be done with emotional maturity and intelligence. Before commenting, please thoroughly read the article and other comments, then stay on topic. Address the issues without presumptions about the author(s) or other persons.

We will remove any comment that is a personal attack or off-topic, abusive, exceptionally incoherent, libelous, mysogonist, obscene, phobic, profane, racist, or otherwise inappropriate. Removal for cause may occur without prior notice and repeat offenders may lose commenting privileges. These abuses and/or any attempt to post a solicitations and/or advertising, flood, spam, or otherwise disrupt TS-Si.org operations are subject to further sanctions.

All comments are subject to our terms of use and overall site policies, available under the About menu tab.


Security code
Refresh