is dedicated to the acceptance, medical treatment, and legal protection of individuals correcting the misalignment of their brains and their anatomical sex, while supporting their transition into society.
TS-Si.org is on an intermittent publication schedule during the current weather emergency in the Washington, DC area.
Join The Flow!
TS-Si supports
open access to
publicly funded research
Haiti Quake Info Line. Americans seeking info about family members in Haiti can call the State Dept Operations Center: 1-888-407-4747.
The Clinton Bush Haiti Fund, operated by the former presidents, accepts cash donations. Link.
| Washington State: Discredited Research, Religious Bias |
 |
 |
| Opinion - Editorials | |||
| TS-Si | |||
| Wednesday, 09 August 2006 20:00 | |||
|
Misuse of the Johns Hopkins debacle
 Springfield, VA, USA. Do people born transsexual have the same rights as other residents in Washington State? Faced with burgeoning Medicaid costs, the state imposed fiscal discipline by excluding a handful of residents simply because they are people born transsexual. Washington has prohibited payments for Sex Reassignment Surgery (SRS). Douglas Porter, the Medicaid Director, endorsed the use of discredited research and religious bias when making public policy.
He used the infamous Johns Hopkins debacle as the basis for saying that SRS is "unnecessary".
Medicaid in Washington State funded a total of six sex reassignment surgeries over the past 15 years. But a recent refusal resulted in court action by two transsexuals seeking payments for their travel out of state to undergo SRS. A state Auditor's report resulted in Republican attempts to pass legislation that included an outright ban on Medicaid funding. The legislative initiative failed.
Douglas Porter, the State Medicaid Director, jumped in and declared that SRS is “unnecessary”. Mr. Porter cited the conclusions of Hayes Inc., an independent health technology assessment organization, that claimed sex-change surgery is no more effective than hormone treatment and psychotherapy. Porter and his consultants based their conclusions on discredited Johns Hopkins Research.
The Hopkins influence derives from Dr. Paul McHugh, who became chairperson of the psychiatric department at Johns Hopkins in 1979. McHugh is an influential conservative Catholic who has long campaigned to "stop sex changes". He has described women born transsexual as "... caricatures of women". As a consulting psychiatrist to the Vatican in 2000 on sexual matters, he influenced the declaration that transsexualism is a mental pathology and "doesn't exist" as a medical condition. He now serves as a member of the US President's Council for Bioethics.
Earlier, McHugh ordered follow-up evaluations on their former transsexual patients. The study found that most of the patients claimed happiness in their target sex. Nonetheless, department investigators concluded that the patients’ psychological functioning had not sufficiently improved. McHugh concluded that physical reassignment cooperated ". . . with a mental illness” rather than trying for a cure [of the “illness”]. Johns Hopkins closed its clinic and has not performed any SRS surgeries since that time.
There has been widespread criticism of McHugh's conclusions, noting that the purpose of reassignment is to help transsexual people become happy and content with their bodies. Improvements in psychological functioning are seen as a different issue.
The State of Washington has to decide how to spend their Medicaid funds, but should do so in a fair and enlightened manner. The cases of the transsexuals currently seeking SRS should be evaluated on the basis of their initial eligibility for Medicaid in the first place, followed by a careful adherence to contemporary medical protocols in evaluating the strength of their claims for treatment, including surgery.
We can only hope that public policy is based on sound principles of governance, science – not religious prejudice, a respect for facts, and an equitable distribution of resources.
For Washngton to base an important decision on the discredited Hopkins experience and ignore definitive scientific work is bad enough.
But there is another question: do people born transsexual have the same rights as other residents in Washington State?
TS-Si.org Editorials convey the official positions of our organization, TS-Si. They do not necessarily reflect the opinion of TS-Si authors, partners, or affiliates. Signed articles by our contributing authors or referenced news sources do not constitute official policy. We welcome your comments. You can use the public form below or send private correspondence via the TS-Si Contact Page. We will not divulge any personal details or place you on a mailing list without your permission.
The TS-Si News Service is a collaborative effort by TS-Si.org editors, contributors, and corresponding institutions. The sources can include the cited individuals and organizations, as well as TS-Si.org staff contributions. Articles and news reports do not necessarily convey official positions of TS-Si, its partners, or affiliates. We welcome your comments. Use the form below to leave a public comment or send private correspondence via the TS-Si Contact Page. We will not divulge any personal details or place you on a mailing list without your permission.                       Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites. To create link towards this article on your website, copy and paste the text below in your page. Preview :
Set as favorite
Email This
Comments (0)
 Write comment
|
|||
| Last Updated on Wednesday, 25 February 2009 22:56 |
Subscribe to this comment's feed
Show/Hide comments
Show/Hide comment form
The TS-Si News Service
and the TS-Si Research Service
are collaborations of TS-Si officials, staff, contributors, and corresponding institutions. Contents do not necessarily convey official positions of
TS-Si, its partners, or its affiliates. 