FeedFeed2CommentsDeliciousDiggFacebookTwitter
Leave a comment.
Campaigns
Sign the petition to remove the umbrella use of the term 'transgender' to cover women of transsexual / intersex history.
Petition: remove women of transsexual / intersex history from the GLAAD Media Reference Guide.
[ link ] Also read Andrea Rosenfield's call for reform here at TS-Si.[ link ]
TS-Si supports open access to publicly funded research.
TS-Si supports open and immediate access to publicly funded research.
XKCD
TS-Si Site News
TS-Si Reboot Gets Underway
Some Face Perception Not Uniquely Human Print E-mail
SciMed - Biology
TS-Si News Service   
Wednesday, 13 April 2011 15:00
Iowa City, IA, USA. First evidence has emerged that human perceptual processes for facial recognition are present in other vertebrates, a finding that challenges traditional behavioral research and increases the importance of biological traits in the continuing debates over nature vs. nurture.

People count on the human face try to reveal identity and emotional expressions that aid identification and categorization, a trait that can either enhance or impede communication.

Ed Wasserman, a professor of experimental psychology, and graduate student Fabian Soto, both of the University of Iowa (UI), conducted the study and published their findings in the Journal of Vision. Instead of making comparisons with other primates, Wasserman and Soto focused on a species at a greater evolutionary distance, the common pigeon.

General and Adaptive Mechanisms



Human Identity and Emotional Expression. University of Iowa (UI) researchers found that pigeons recognize a human face's identity and emotional expression in much the same way as people do.

The image shows examples of the face stimuli shown to the pigeons in experiments conducted by Fabian Soto and Ed Wasserman.

Click Pic for Details
Comparing the traits and performance of distantly related species is a useful scientific strategy for isolating a specific behavior and determining whether is due to a general perceptual system or the result of a specialized adaptation. If the distantly related species share a remote common ancestor they are more likely to share mechanisms for information processing.
  • Survival across diverse environments results from the general mechanisms (e.g., object recognition is general).

  • Adaptive specializations should be present in only one of two distantly related species under comparison (e.g., face recognotion is particular) — unless, of course, convergent evolution of the same processes result from similar evolutionary pressures.

Vision science recognizes that birds compare well with primates because the two groups possess the most advanced biological visual systems. However, it is highly unlikely that birds have evolved a specialized system for the processing of human faces. Any similarities between the two groups are therefore the likely result of conserved evolutionary mechanisms.
  • Previous studies assessed the ability of birds to categorize human faces and showed that pigeons and crows can do it according to gender and emotion. Moreover, they transfer this learning to novel visual images.

  • Color and shading were shown to be particularly important in the gender studies. Pigeons use information near the eyes and chin to discriminate between male and female faces, using information near the mouth to distinguish between happy and neural faces.

The Mix of General and Adaptive

The authors of the current study found that even pigeons recognize a human face's identity and emotional expression in much the same way as people do. The authors found that both specialized and general processes are likely to be involved when people recognize other human faces, requiring empirical verification of both before coming to firm conclusions.

Pigeons were shown photographs of human faces that varied in the identity of the face, as well as in their emotional expression — such as a frown or a smile.
  • Experiment 1 was preparatory, a study of whether pigeons can perceive the similarity structure of stimuli that vary along the dimensions of human face identity and emotional expression.

    Pigeons, like humans, were observed to perceive the similarity among faces sharing identity and emotion.

  • Experiment 2 was designed to task the pigeons with categorizing the photographs according to only one of these dimensions and to ignore the other.

    The pigeons found it easier to ignore emotion when they recognized face identity than to ignore identity when they recognized face emotion.

Observations and New Directions

The researchers studied pigeons in this project because they have excellent vision and are not close evolutionary relatives of humans. Pigeons do not have a specialized system for face processing, but they still show similarities to people when they are trained to recognize human faces. The simplest interpretation of these similarities is that they result from general recognition processes shared by both species.

"This asymmetry has been found many times in experiments with people and it has always been interpreted as the result of the unique organization of the human face processing system." Soto said. "We have provided the first evidence suggesting that this effect can arise from perceptual processes present in other vertebrates.

"The point of the project is not that pigeons perceive faces just as we do or that people do not have specialized processes for face perception. Rather, the point is that both specialized and general processes are likely to be involved in peoples' recognition of faces and that the contributions of each should be carefully determined empirically," he added.

It has been a popular practice among behavioral researchers in perception and cognition to speculate about specialized mechanisms without offering convincing empirical data to support their ideas. The new findings could make scientists reconsider their assumptions about how uniquely human cognitive processes might interact with more general processes in complex tasks such as face recognition.

"We hope that our research will prompt other researchers to conduct more comparative work to assess their claims about the evolution of uniquely human perceptual and cognitive processes," Wasserman said.

FundingThe research was funded by grants from the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) and the National Eye Institute (NEI).
ParticipationThe experiments were conducted in Edward Wasserman's UI laboratory in 2009 and 2010.

Edward A. Wasserman's research interests include the comparative analysis of learning, memory, and cognition, with special interests in conceptualization, causation, and visual perception.

Fabian A. Soto is a graduate student in the Cognition and Perception area of the Department of Psychology at the University of Iowa (UI). He studies visual categorization and object recognition in people and animals.
CitationAsymmetrical interactions in the perception of face identity and emotional expression are not unique to the primate visual system. Fabian A. Soto and Edward A. Wasserman. Journal of Vision 2011; 1(3), article 24. doi:10.1167/11.3.24
Download PDF
Abstract

The human visual system appears to process the identity of faces separately from their emotional expression, whereas the human visual system does not appear to process emotional expression separately from identity. All current explanations of this visual processing asymmetry implicitly assume that it arises because of the organization of a specialized human face perception system. A second possibility is that this finding reflects general principles of perceptual processing. Studying animals that are unlikely to have evolved a specialized face perception system may shed fresh light on this issue. We report two experiments that investigated the interaction of identity and emotional expression in pigeons' perception of human faces. Experiment 1 found that pigeons perceive the similarity among faces sharing identity and emotion, and that these two dimensions are integral according to a spatial model of generalization. Experiment 2 found that pigeons' discrimination of emotion was reliably affected by irrelevant variations in identity, whereas pigeons' discrimination of identity was not reliably affected by irrelevant variations in emotion. Thus, the asymmetry previously reported in human studies was reproduced in our pigeon study. These results challenge the view that a specialized human face perception system must underlie this effect.

Keywords: face recognition, categorization, object recognition.

TS-Si News ServiceThe TS-Si News Service is a collaborative effort by TS-Si.org editors, contributors, and corresponding institutions. The sources can include the cited individuals and organizations, as well as TS-Si.org staff contributions. Articles and news reports do not necessarily convey official positions of TS-Si, its partners, or affiliates.

We welcome your comments. Use the form below to leave a public comment or send private correspondence via the TS-Si Contact Page. We will not divulge any personal details or place you on a mailing list without your permission.


TS-Si is dedicated to the acceptance, medical treatment, and legal protection of individuals correcting the misalignment of their brains and their anatomical sex, while supporting their transition into society as hormonally reconstituted and surgically corrected citizens.

Quote this article on your site

To create link towards this article on your website,
copy and paste the text below in your page.




Preview :


Trackback(0)
Comments (0)

Write comment

Last Updated on Tuesday, 12 April 2011 16:52
 
FeedFeed2CommentsDeliciousDiggFacebookTwitter